[ SECRET POST #2153 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2153 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 104 secrets from Secret Submission Post #308.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[morieris]

That's very true for a lot of SJ topics. I'm okay if people want to discuss to keep with our example reclaiming words, but the feelings of the group that the word affects should probably be heeded more, in my opinion.

[(Anonymous)]

For sure, and all those words have different histories which would affect them all individually. Like, "fag" doesn't have the same history as the "n-word", so reclaiming those words by the respective groups they target will be entirely different... But the topic can still be discussed in general, I think.

And I personally never believe that just because someone is not part of that group that their opinion is automatically meaningless.

[(Anonymous)]

This, on both counts. At the end it should come down the group what gets decided and that should be respected, but deciding that someone's opinion is 'invalid' in a discussion, or even that they can't be a part of that discussion, because they aren't a part of that group? Not cool, and excludes someone who could have an interesting view point on the topic you've never considered.

[diet_poison]

This...I don't think the opinions of people outside that group should be like, banned from the discussion or something. But obviously people who *are* part of the affected group should have more weight assigned to their opinions on the topic.