Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-11-28 05:30 pm
[ SECRET POST #2157 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2157 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[2 Broke Girls]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Love Actually]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Me and My Dick]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Journey Into Mystery]
__________________________________________________
06.

[cracked.com]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Ryan Kwanten/L4D2]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Whispering Corridors, Memento Mori, The Wishing Stairs]
__________________________________________________
09.

[The Walking Dead (game)]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Kuragehime]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Thor]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Bartimaeus]
__________________________________________________
13.

[The Sentinel]
__________________________________________________
14.

[The Mentalist and The Addams Family]
__________________________________________________
15.

[Skyfall]
__________________________________________________
16.

[Generator Rex]
__________________________________________________
17.

[Partners]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 036 secrets from Secret Submission Post #308.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat
You have a right to be put off by it but I mean, we don't censor people with facial features we don't like or horrible clothing choices...
Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat
(Anonymous) 2012-11-29 12:57 am (UTC)(link)Also, I feel public nudity is different from fashion. It's just cultural differences. There are places outside where I live where it is legal too so... there are a lot of options for them.
Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat
(Anonymous) 2012-11-29 02:27 am (UTC)(link)For the record, I think it should be illegal for men to go shirtless outside of pools, beaches, etc. Most stores, restaurants, and other establishments in my area ban shirtless men from entering, anyway.
Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat
(Anonymous) 2012-11-29 05:07 am (UTC)(link)Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat
(Anonymous) 2012-11-29 05:45 am (UTC)(link)I'm perfectly okay with all men walking around in their birthday suits if all women do it too
Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat
(Anonymous) 2012-11-29 10:35 pm (UTC)(link)Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat
(Anonymous) 2012-11-29 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat
No (to the underwear question), nor would I be okay with women doing the same thing. But I don't put breasts in that category. I also do not think they are associated in the mind with reproduction as much as they are with men's sexual desires.
How do you feel about public breastfeeding?
Also, why on Earth do you think men shouldn't be allowed to go shirtless? I'm not talking about restaurants and such - if it's a private establishment the owner can set the rules. I'm talking about just in public. Why? There's nothing there for them to cover up.
Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat
(Anonymous) 2012-11-29 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat
They are associated with sex but that doesn't mean they're defined by sex. Nipples can be erogenous zones, but so can feet, necks, and lips (for example). They are not associated with reproduction but in fact aren't directly involved in the reproductive act - they are involved with nourishing children, which I think is nothing to be ashamed of and nothing to hide.
In fact reproduction itself is a central part of human existence and I don't think we should censor or hide reproduction. I can definitely get on board with not having one's genitals hanging out, but not specifically because of their reproductive connotation. Breasts and nipples are very different things from genitals, anyway.
Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat
(Anonymous) 2012-11-29 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)Some people do put breasts in that category (and conflate "reproduction" with "sexual desires," too). For those people, exposed breasts aren't much more acceptable than bared genitals.
I personally think public breastfeeding should be banned.
And to be consistent, if women are banned from being shirtless, men should too, right?
Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat
I kinda think this is a problem though. I mean if everyone in your community is literally ok with that then it's one thing but the consequences of that end up being that people have to censor their own bodies for others' comfort.
Why ban public breastfeeding? What is it about nourishing an infant that is so offensive??? D: I mean I do find that kind of upsetting tbh