case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-12-02 03:05 pm

[ SECRET POST #2161 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2161 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 098 secrets from Secret Submission Post #309.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
citrinesunset: (Default)

[personal profile] citrinesunset 2012-12-03 04:16 am (UTC)(link)
Except, "marriage" wasn't on the polls. Gay marriage was. Your vote had no effect on the legality of marriage as a whole--it just helped disenfranchise a particular group of people. That's a homophobic action, whether you had homophobic intentions or not.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-03 04:41 am (UTC)(link)
THAT'S NOT WHAT DISENFRANCHISE MEANS FOR THE LOVE OF FUCK.

EVERYONE STOP USING THIS WORD THAT WAY. IT DOESN'T EVEN HAVE "EN" IN IT.

The word is "disfranchise," and it specifically refers to voting rights. The right to vote is the franchise. If you aren't taking away a person's right to vote, then you aren't disfranchising them. THE END.
nyxelestia: Rose Icon (Default)

[personal profile] nyxelestia 2012-12-03 05:24 am (UTC)(link)


OMG thank you! This sort of thing bugs me every time I see it.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-03 01:25 pm (UTC)(link)
My dictionary tells me disenfranchise is the primary version, but disfranchise is also correct.

Online Etymology Dictionary tells me disfranchise was the earlier form, dating to the mid-15th century, but disenfranchise has been around since the 1640s.

I can see a difference, actually -- disenfranchise would be to de-enfranchise, reverse having given someone the vote. Someone disfranchised has never been able to vote.