case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-12-02 03:05 pm

[ SECRET POST #2161 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2161 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 098 secrets from Secret Submission Post #309.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
therangerking: (Default)

[personal profile] therangerking 2012-12-03 05:49 am (UTC)(link)
Actually, I've seen repetition done very well (Allen Ginsberg, for example) and I've done it myself. I've also seen amazing books in which grammar is utter crap (the first bits of Flowers for Algernon, anyone?). I have read incredibly choppy, jarring writing that seems to make no sense (James Joyce, William S. Burrough, even Terry Pratchett's footnotes) that's still very, very good. There is literally nothing that defines good writing, because every single thing within a text is the tool of the writer. It really comes down to a writer's skill in using any of it, really. 8D

(Anonymous) 2012-12-03 09:44 am (UTC)(link)
Now here's a comment I can get behind!