case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-12-05 05:21 pm

[ SECRET POST #2164 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2164 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #309.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-06 01:57 am (UTC)(link)
Ugh I remember those. These arguments are the reason that "Slippery slope argument" is now only seen as "slippery slope fallacy"

I remember reading an argument paper JUST like that where someone was angry that people dared to compare the fight for gay marriage rights to the civil rights movement. (Kinda reminding me of the people who claim that acknowledged that men do get raped and abused is an insult...somehow..to the "real" woman victims.) I saw the person saying things like "if we pass this then we'll have to allow people to marry multiple spouses or adults to marry children" I wasn't sure whether to laugh or cry , I just went with a good ol' facepalm.

gay marriage involves two-count 'em TWO- CONSENTING ADULTS- getting married. So saying that its acceptance will mean that people can marry anything is uh...stupid.

also- I'm a religious person ...and I believe that if your religion says "don't do this" it means YOU don't do that not "make sure no one does". If a person who couldn't eat pork (no offense to those who can't not saying you'd act like this) came up to me when I was getting some pork ribs and started shrieking that I was a disgusting sinner who is going to hell I'd be like "...uh different religion pal, shoo"

(Anonymous) 2012-12-06 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
AYRT

I can't really add much, but plus all the things to your comment, especially the last paragraph.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-06 02:37 am (UTC)(link)
I can't help wonder if we had the same book. was it a St. Martin's textbook?

(Anonymous) 2012-12-06 03:06 am (UTC)(link)
I don't have it anymore, it was a couple years ago that I took that class, but after googling it I'm pretty sure it was.