case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-12-11 06:48 pm

[ SECRET POST #2170 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2170 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Nikita (CW)]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Pirates! Band of Misfits]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Star Wars Expanded Universe]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Buffy the Vampire Slayer / Angel the Series]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Avengers/MCU, Steve Rogers and Tony Stark]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Go On]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Star Trek: Deep Space Nine]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Sailor Moon]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Persona 4]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Kili/Tauriel, The Hobbit]


__________________________________________________



13.
[How to Destroy Angels/Mariqueen Maandig]


__________________________________________________



14.
[Glee]


__________________________________________________



15.
[Les Revenants]


__________________________________________________



16.
[The Walking Dead]


__________________________________________________



17.
[The Real Adventures of Jonny Quest]


__________________________________________________



18.
[Gyakuten Saiban/Ace Attorney]


__________________________________________________














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #310.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
lunabee34: (Default)

[personal profile] lunabee34 2012-12-12 02:27 am (UTC)(link)
To be fair, if she only did what was in the books, she would have had possibly thirty seconds of screen time. LOL

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 02:52 am (UTC)(link)
With how much I absolutely hated everything they did with Arwen, I would have been perfectly okay with that.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 03:46 am (UTC)(link)
If they did that, I would have rather they cut her existence out entirely. It would have been pointless to have her because no one who hadn't read the books would have had a clue who this person Aragorn was in love with was.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 03:17 am (UTC)(link)
True. I personally liked what they did with Arwen in the films - in fact, I hadn't read the books prior to seeing the movies and I was actually disappointed when she wasn't in the films more than she was. So... there's a different perspective for you.
lunabee34: (Default)

[personal profile] lunabee34 2012-12-12 03:21 am (UTC)(link)
*nods*

I really enjoy Tolkien's books, but they're a total sausage fest. I was glad to see more of Arwen onscreen than the books allowed for and glad that Eowyn and Galadriel both as much screentime as they did.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 02:28 pm (UTC)(link)
You're a tool of the patriarchy, congratulations.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:00 pm (UTC)(link)
wanting more female characters in a movie = tool of the patriarchy now? all RIGHTY then