case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-12-18 06:35 pm

[ SECRET POST #2177 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2177 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #311.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
greenvelvetcake: (wut)

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake 2012-12-19 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
Aside from the Playboy breed, what sexy bunnies did you have in mind?
diet_poison: (Default)

could be any of these... [image heavy]

[personal profile] diet_poison 2012-12-19 04:41 am (UTC)(link)








Damn, fiction sure has a lot of rabbits. 0_0

Re: could be any of these... [image heavy]

(Anonymous) 2012-12-19 06:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Only Bugs could be called even remotely sexy.
tabaqui: (Default)

Re: could be any of these... [image heavy]

[personal profile] tabaqui 2012-12-19 06:48 pm (UTC)(link)
The one with the lumpy ears kind of freaks me out. They look heavy and kind of...tumor-y.
*shudders*
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: could be any of these... [image heavy]

[personal profile] diet_poison 2012-12-19 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
If you're talking about the third-from-last one - that's really funny because that's a Pokémon that a lot of people have kind of sexed up in fanart.

tbh I'm not sure why they decided to design in that way...
tabaqui: (Default)

Re: could be any of these... [image heavy]

[personal profile] tabaqui 2012-12-19 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, the brown and tan one. Just....ew. Maybe they're supposed to be fluffy but they just look....

Ew.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: could be any of these... [image heavy]

[personal profile] diet_poison 2012-12-20 02:25 am (UTC)(link)
Google "sexy Lopunny". (At your own risk. Most aren't that bad, but there are a few...)

And honestly, look at its figure. It's supposed to be an ANIMAL but you have to admit with that design, whoever created Lopunny was just asking for that kind of thing to happen. They basically gave it the body of a female model, and added fur and giant ears.
tabaqui: (Default)

Re: could be any of these... [image heavy]

[personal profile] tabaqui 2012-12-20 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
I am not that brave. :)

And yeah - it's basically a furry. With horrible, horrible ears.
*runs away*
diet_poison: (Bruce Banner - green)

Re: could be any of these... [image heavy]

[personal profile] diet_poison 2012-12-20 07:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Yyyup.

It has to be one of the worst Pokémon designs ever. Which is saying something since there are about six hundred of them right now.