fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2181 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2181 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

15.

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 100 secrets from Secret Submission Post #312.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 1 2 (again) - repeat ], [ 4 - trolls ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

So everyone is shallow even if just a little bit. I probably won't date a guy shorter than be and he has to be atleast decent looking even if he has the best personality ever I just can't don't see them that way. What about you F's?

Extremely.

I am actually astoundingly not shallow, and though I think the 1-10 rating system is kyriarchal bullshit, apparently I'm an 8, which has led to people WTFing at my dating choices. I honestly need an intellect and a sense of humor more than I need pretties, so my SOs are evenly split between pretty intelligent funny people and not-pretty intelligent funny people.

"bullshit" Oh, look, the only part of your post I believed.

I guess...moderately shallow? I mean, I can't lie and say I'm one of those people who goes "It shouldn't matter at all what someone looks like because it's ~*what's on the inside that counts*~" because I guess looks are important to me to a certain extent but I wouldn't say I'm super concerned with physical appearance (and, lbr, I would be a hypocrite if I was. I don't consider myself ugly, but I'm certainly no knock-out)

I wouldn't date someone if they spelled as poorly as you do.

?? I thought OP's spelling was fine. The grammar however..

OP

I apologize, I was on my galaxy phone and typing is hard.

I need to find the person attractive, but that doesn't necessarily mean that they are really pretty. I do care about peoples looks though: Who doesn't?

I am much more picky when it comes to intelligenze and personality, I can't date you if you aren't as smart or smarter than me or if you can't take a joke and so on.

I won't date people I don't find physically attractive in some way or another. Won't do it.

Mainly because I've done the "pity date/give them a chance!" thing before, and that shit only ever ends badly. So...if I'm not attracted to someone from the get-go, they need to learn that "no" means "never."

Seriously, mostly not. It's personalities that I develop crushes on first. I'm sure that there are people who could physically turn me off even if I had the hots for their personalities, but it's pretty much never happened - closest I've come is when I started semi-crushing on a guy and then went away for the summer, and when I came back he'd got into a seriously bad drinking habit, stopped engaging in personal hygiene and put on about 30lbs of beerbelly. (I'm generally not shallow about fat - I'm in an LTR with someone who's been clinically obese for the whole time I've known them - but nothing done by alcoholism is ever flattering.)

In terms of appearance? Not much at all. I am, however, an intellectual snob; there's at least one fellow who's indicated his interest more than once that I would probably be interested in if his IQ* were ten points higher.

*Yes, I'm aware of the problematic nature of intelligence testing in general and IQ in particular, especially where racial minorities are concerned. I'm using it as shorthand here.

I need to find someone attractive, but what I find attractive can be pretty damn idiosyncratic. Certainly, I don't give a shit about perceived attractiveness or social standing, which I think is what "shallowness" references.

Not very. I don't really care about what a guy looks like, I tend to go off how they emote.

Grain of salt considering I've only ever actually dated the current guy I'm with and he's pretty easy on the eyes, though.

I'm not interested in anyone who is masculine.

I'd never date anyone I wasn't physically attracted to. There's just no point. You're going to end up viewing sex as an obligation, chore, or charity, and frankly your partner deserves better than that.

Pretty shallow. But I won't date attractive people if they look too "bland". I don't know how else to describe it. Even if I really like them there has to be a traditionally ugly physical feature that "clicks" for me.

You seem to think having preferences is shallow, even if a person isn't a jerk about it and physical attraction is rarely voluntary.

Eat shit. Nobody owes anybody a date.

[ SECRET POST #2181 ]

How shallow are you?

Re: How shallow are you?

Re: How shallow are you?

Re: How shallow are you?

Re: How shallow are you?

Re: How shallow are you?

Re: How shallow are you?

Re: How shallow are you?

Re: How shallow are you?

Re: How shallow are you?

Re: How shallow are you?

Re: How shallow are you?

Re: How shallow are you?

Re: How shallow are you?

Re: How shallow are you?

Re: How shallow are you?

Re: How shallow are you?

Re: How shallow are you?