Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-12-22 03:14 pm
[ SECRET POST #2181 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2181 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 100 secrets from Secret Submission Post #312.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 1 2 (again) - repeat ], [ 4 - trolls ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
We can go by the amount of movies, which is what you were using against Dreamworks in comparison to Pixar. Disney has made more movies than Dreamworks, so yeah, they have more PoC. But this logic is faulty, since a lot of early Disney films were made in a time were a PoC lead would have been unlikely.
DW has had Prince of Egypt (no white person in sight), Joseph, Sinbad, Spirit and the Road to el Dorado. And if they don't change the source material, The True Meaning of Smekday will have a poc female lead. Pixar has the two characters that I mentioned. I was arguing against your "Pixar is better than Dreamworks in representation" No, they really aren't.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-24 06:51 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-01 05:41 am (UTC)(link)(Again, sorry for posting to a dead thread, but again, LOVE for that book but no one to talk about it with.)
no subject