case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-12-26 06:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #2185 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2185 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.
[not a repeat; was broken yesterday]


__________________________________________________



16.
[not a repeat; was broken yesterday]


__________________________________________________













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #312.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: the only opinion that matters

(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 04:53 am (UTC)(link)
How do you think those dates were assigned to those signs? The "zodiac" most commonly used doesn't match up to the positions of the stars anymore, so the signs really are arbitrary. "Aquarius" doesn't mean much more than "A bunch of crackpots decided that, because the sun transited the constellation of Aquarius on January 25th 1,000 years ago, I was born under a magical sign!"

Just because "Aquarius" more commonly accepted than "Hufflepuff" doesn't mean it's any less strange as a self-descriptor.

Re: the only opinion that matters

(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 05:01 am (UTC)(link)
There is a technical date for it. I don't care how they were assigned. They are accepted, and there's a precise date for them. You are an Aquarius, or you are not. And I've already expressed the personality part is stupid.

There is no Sorting Hat, you can't become a Hufflepuff.

Re: the only opinion that matters

(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 05:24 am (UTC)(link)
There are ranges of dates, and there are different zodiacs with different ranges of dates. (And who really does "accept" them nowadays, anyway?)

"Hufflepuff" in this case is just a descriptor of...oh, forget it. Be one with the spirit of Hufflepuff. Believe in the Hufflepuff that exists within you.

Re: the only opinion that matters

(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 06:02 am (UTC)(link)
I honestly don't see how that makes a difference. So what if there are ranges of dates? Different zodiacs? You belong to all of them, because the zodiac ONLY means 'you were born on this date', and all other definitions wildly vary. Again, you keep trying to make this about the horoscope mumbo jumbo. I'm just talking dates and names.

Re: the only opinion that matters

(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 08:03 am (UTC)(link)
There are no set dates and names.

Re: the only opinion that matters

(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 10:22 am (UTC)(link)
What? Is January 8 not a date to you? Is "Capricorn" not a word?

End of discussion.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
There are no set dates and names.