case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-12-28 07:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #2187 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2187 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05. [repeat]


__________________________________________________














[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]














06. [SPOILERS for Once Upon a Time]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for amazing spiderman]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Nu52 Stormwatch]



__________________________________________________















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]















09. [WARNING for rape, sexual assault, gore]

[SCP Foundation wiki]


__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for abuse]



__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for child sexual abuse]



__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for violence, RL deaths]



__________________________________________________













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #312.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 (not broken, but being reported as malicious?) - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - personal attack ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-29 03:06 am (UTC)(link)
I don't see how anyone can come to any other conclusion from the way he writes about them.

Maybe because we're not Anita Sarkeesian?

(Anonymous) 2012-12-29 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
I think you need to read more intelligent authors and you'll pick up the difference between someone who writes about sexual abuse as titillating/exciting and someone who actually analyzes its implications and ramifications.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-29 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
Show me examples of where Sansa's abuse was meant to be titillating and not horrific. I'm waiting.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-29 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
The entire Blackwater scene with Sandor. Sandor's creepy obsession with her is constantly written as if he's a just a smitten 12-year-old and it's just so sweet that he has a crush on the pretty girl in class.

I gave away books 1 and 2 so I can't get them out and type an actual passage, but the eroticizing language he uses in these types of scenes bothers me as well. The phrase "small, perky breasts" recurs a LOT.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-29 03:44 am (UTC)(link)
The entire Blackwater scene with Sandor. Sandor's creepy obsession with her is constantly written as if he's a just a smitten 12-year-old and it's just so sweet that he has a crush on the pretty girl in class.

I have no idea what you were reading, then. Even the most ardent Sansan shipper would never characterize Sandor's behavior towards Sansa during Blackwater as being "sweet". Sandor was written to be pretty scary in that scene.
visp: (Default)

[personal profile] visp 2012-12-29 03:49 am (UTC)(link)
No, that's the weirdo Sansan shippers. Don't confuse canon with fandom.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-29 09:55 am (UTC)(link)
This.