[ SECRET POST #2187 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2187 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05. [repeat]


__________________________________________________














[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]














06. [SPOILERS for Once Upon a Time]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for amazing spiderman]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Nu52 Stormwatch]



__________________________________________________















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]















09. [WARNING for rape, sexual assault, gore]

[SCP Foundation wiki]


__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for abuse]



__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for child sexual abuse]



__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for violence, RL deaths]



__________________________________________________













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #312.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 (not broken, but being reported as malicious?) - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - personal attack ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

So what was your interpretation, given the 'required to be sex offenders', 'need for emotional response', 'no extreme violence or the subject may die' and 'need to reset their memory so they don't become desentiziced to it'?

Whoever wrote it can insist they weren't thinking about rape, but they put all the clues there and just didn't write the word rape so they could imply people are shitty while the author makes themselves look clever.

[(Anonymous)]

My interpretation was "the worst thing I can possibly think of, so I don't want to think about it." I think that was the whole intention of the article, since spelling out 110-Montauk as the gang rape of a child would have removed the "eerie, disturbing horror" element while making the text explicitly vile and disgusting. The monstrosity of 110-Montauk is supposed to creep up on the reader, not smack them upside the head.