[ SECRET POST #2187 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2187 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05. [repeat]


__________________________________________________














[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]














06. [SPOILERS for Once Upon a Time]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for amazing spiderman]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Nu52 Stormwatch]



__________________________________________________















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]















09. [WARNING for rape, sexual assault, gore]

[SCP Foundation wiki]


__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for abuse]



__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for child sexual abuse]



__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for violence, RL deaths]



__________________________________________________













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #312.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 (not broken, but being reported as malicious?) - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - personal attack ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

The emphasis is on "convicted," so it could be a combination of SCP and governmental protocol. It's implied that a lot of Class-D personnel have criminal backgrounds, but the switch to sex-offenders was only made after a failed 110-Montauk procedure on SCP-231-5 (I've got the article open in another tab). You can interpret that two ways: 1) only convicted sex offenders can carry out the procedure without fail (110-Montauk is gang rape), or 2) only convicted sex offenders are disposable enough in the event of another procedure failure (110-Montauk isn't gang rape). Other violent criminals are exempt from it out of fear that they'll kill SCP-231.

It's not "punishment detail" for regular SCP employees, but it could be for Class-D personnel.

[(Anonymous)]

DA - I'm not sure I understand your point with 2). Do you mean that if the procedure fails, they want disposable personnel around? That would only make sense if the failure events were containable to a particular area or particular personnel - but if that was the case, they'd have just surrounded the poor girls with disposables/volunteers and then put them out of their misery (SCP's done that sort of thing before). Instead, it's strongly implied that the failure events are massive, uncontainable, and involve large numbers of inevitable civilian casualties - given the "seven seals" reference, possibly on a global/natural disaster scale - and can't be risked regardless of the precautions taken.

So I don't see how that works, even if you do postulate that convicted nonviolent sex offenders are somehow automatically more "disposable" than anyone else.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm pretty sure that the failure events have been containable thus far, but have been getting progressively worse? The article is vague on what happened when the former SCP-231 subjects gave birth (ugh, I hate even typing that out, it's so creepy).

Convicted sex offenders are at the bottom of the totem pole, prison-wise, so they'd be the most likely out of Class-D personnel to remain on site, carry out 110-Montauk without emotional stress (and without killing SCP-231), and not be missed in the case of a procedure failure.