case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-12-29 02:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #2188 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2188 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 102 secrets from Secret Submission Post #313.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
visp: (Default)

[personal profile] visp 2012-12-29 08:58 pm (UTC)(link)
And I'm going to be totally pedantic and say that everything you said there supports the "dying because they can't live without each other" thing.

And the tragedy is that if they had just talked to their parents, they could have publicly married each other and the whole thing could have been averted.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-29 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Juliette did talk to her parents. Their response was, "You're going to marry Paris and you're going to like it!"

Seriously, the main crux of the play was the feud between the Montagues and the Capulets! It took the death of Romeo and Juliette to get them to reconcile, there was no way they'd allow a public marriage!
visp: (Default)

[personal profile] visp 2012-12-29 09:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Her talk was just "I, for no reason, don't want to marry Paris." "I've already married and bedded Romeo" would have gotten a lot of swearing, but at the end of the day, what can you do? Capulet stomps down to Montague's house and offers a deal where they both go to the Prince and agree to make peace by marrying their kids together, if the Prince'll recind Romeo's banishment. The prince agrees because it's the best way to stop the feud and if the Capulets are willing to forgive Tybalt's death, who is he to say no?

Shotgun weddings and "well, we already banged, so deal" marriage arrangements are time-honored.

And if, before that, after the balcony scene, Romeo had gone to his dad and said "Hey, I'd like to give up my womanizing and marry Capulet's only kid," his Dad would have made the arrangements. Remember, at that point, Capulet likes him enough to let him crash his parties, and is looking for someone to marry his daughter off to.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-29 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)
I think the more likely outcome would have been "Capulet stomps down to Montague's house and demands Romeo's head, then disowns Juliette as a harlot and a traitor to the family."
visp: (Default)

[personal profile] visp 2012-12-29 09:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Possibly, but they did legally marry, and Capulet has only has one child. Unless he wants to cause huge public scandal, he takes the path that saves face and is politically expedient.

Besides, even if he does kick her out, so what? She goes to the the priest and asks for a lift to Mantua and reunites with Romeo there.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-29 09:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Unless the Capulets succeed in assassinating Romeo.
visp: (Default)

[personal profile] visp 2012-12-29 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)
For eloping with Juliet? Well, they're going to figure that out eventually either way, aren't they? Italy's a small place and Romeo's kicking it with a woman that looks exactly like their daughter, who, for some reason isn't in the crypt any more.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-29 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)
No, no, for killing Tybalt.
visp: (Default)

[personal profile] visp 2012-12-29 10:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Possibly. But then there's still a better chance for him if he comes clean about the whole thing.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-29 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
would have gotten a lot of swearing

And then she would've been sent to a convent or killed.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-29 10:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, it's a Shakespeare tragedy. The whirlpool of suffering would have drawn Romeo and Juliette in no matter what -- this ain't no As You Like It!
visp: (Default)

[personal profile] visp 2012-12-29 10:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Honor killings weren't that big over there - and sending a daughter to a convent is a complete waste of resources, not to mention a great scandal. Publicly approving her marriage to Romeo is financially, socially, and politically a good move.

It still would have been smarter for him to ask for her hand the traditional way, and not elope in the first place, but the odds are still in favor of the wedding being grudgingly approved at this stage.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-30 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
You're delusional. The most likely outcome is Juliet beaten half dead, and shipped off to a monastery if she were still alive a few days later.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-30 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
I think [personal profile] visp is dead-set on applying her modern sensibilities to a tragedy devoid of sensibility, so we should probably let it rest.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-29 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)
And the tragedy is that if they had just talked to their parents, they could have publicly married each other and the whole thing could have been averted.

Perhaps you should actually read Romeo and Juliet before you pretend to know anything about it? Just a thought.
visp: (Default)

[personal profile] visp 2012-12-29 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)
*le sigh* The feud is between the servants and hangers-on. Capulet himself doesn't care - he lets Romeo and his friends stay at his party.

Content thee, gentle coz, let him alone;
He bears him like a portly gentleman;
And, to say truth, Verona brags of him
To be a virtuous and well-govern'd youth:
I would not for the wealth of all the town
Here in my house do him disparagement:
Therefore be patient, take no note of him:
It is my will, the which if thou respect,
Show a fair presence and put off these frowns,
And ill-beseeming semblance for a feast.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-29 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Later, from Lady Capulet:

Tybalt, my cousin! O my brother's child!
O prince! O cousin! husband! O, the blood is spilt
O my dear kinsman! Prince, as thou art true,
For blood of ours, shed blood of Montague.
O cousin, cousin!

...

He is a kinsman to the Montague;
Affection makes him false; he speaks not true:
Some twenty of them fought in this black strife,
And all those twenty could but kill one life.
I beg for justice, which thou, prince, must give;
Romeo slew Tybalt, Romeo must not live.


You can't deny that the Capulets' opinion of Romeo greatly decreased after the Tybalt incident. Also, see how the normally-gentle Capulet's attitude abruptly changes after Juliette tries to postpone the wedding with Paris:

Hang thee, young baggage! disobedient wretch!
I tell thee what: get thee to church o' Thursday,
Or never after look me in the face:
Speak not, reply not, do not answer me;
My fingers itch. Wife, we scarce thought us blest
That God had lent us but this only child;
But now I see this one is one too much,
And that we have a curse in having her:
Out on her, hilding!
visp: (Default)

[personal profile] visp 2012-12-29 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, Lady Capulet's still gonna hate him, sure, but it's not her call. Lord Capulet has scolded Tybalt for picking fights with Romeo before, he knows that it's not entirely Romeos fault.

And yeah, he'd have added a few extra paragraphs to that diatribe if she told him the truth about marrying Romeo, but at the end of the day, if the choice is public scandal or a discreet wedding, what can you do? It's still a better chance than taking a roofie from a priest.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-29 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Putting way too much faith in Lord Capulet, here.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-29 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Your literature teachers have a lot to answer for if this is your reading of R&J. Capulet not wanting to start a mob war by killing Romeo at his party =/= Capulet being cool with Romeo deflowering his little girl.
visp: (Default)

[personal profile] visp 2012-12-29 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
But he would have been cool with Romeo respectfully asking for her hand in marriage.
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2012-12-30 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
I have a lovely copy of R&J with 'prefatory remarks' by Sylvan Barnet of Tufts University. He says that if only Romeo hadn't been a jerk and got in Mercutio's way, Mercutio, being the better swordsman, would have killed Tybalt, and the feud would have petered out.

Mercutio, being a relative of the Prince, would have been slapped on the wrist or maybe even exiled for a bit, but the Prince wouldn't have killed him, and then Romeo and Juliet could have run away or told their parents or *whatever*, and all would have been well.

Not really the 'tragical' ending such a story requires, but it does make me want to write fic in which Mercutio does just that and then goes haring off with the young lovers and eventually - threesome!!

*Mercutio was always my favorite. He is especially lovely in Tanith Lee's retelling, 'Sung in Shadow'.*
visp: (Default)

[personal profile] visp 2012-12-30 07:48 am (UTC)(link)
The problem with over-analyzing a Shakespeare plot is that sometimes he writes gaping plotholes. So one never can tell when the more logical resolution was actually possible or if Shakespeare was just being an idiot. (ie. Desdemona faked her death to get away from her suddenly-abusive husband, obviously, because if she could speak after being smothered she wasn't going to die.)
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2012-12-30 04:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Hehe. I think analyzing him is fun, but yeah - he wrote for the masses and sometimes you read something and you go...wait, what? But wow - what a spectacle that made!

Of course, in the case of R&J, we're talking kids who were, what, fourteen and fifteen or something? I mean - total idiots no matter how you slice it, so he probably got it pretty right.