Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-12-29 02:53 pm
[ SECRET POST #2188 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2188 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 102 secrets from Secret Submission Post #313.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
It's certainly a trend in a lot of the more strident activist communities, in that they can't actually hold a drawn out structured coherent argument, without getting rings run round them.
Now a number of the complaints they make are missappropriated but valid ones. The tone argument for example, did at one point have an actual meaning and reference to a certain approach used to shut down conversation. Or the constant influx of people asking literally the most basic questions in activist spaces involved in high level discourse. Mansplaining underwent a similar trajectory.
However, almost exclusively now they're used as a response for an inability to actually defend what you're saying, which seems to be some sort of bizarre overton window ala Singapore, in which any question of the ideas or boundaries is disallowed to keep the veneer of validity, because it's about two seconds from collapsing in on itself for having absolutely no real grounding.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-30 01:59 am (UTC)(link)I also think that part of it is that they may not even know why doing or saying 'X' is a horrible, horrible thing and makes you the vilest of human beings ever for saying or doing it. They're just parroting what they've been told by their SJW-overlords.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-30 09:12 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-30 09:05 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
And a lot of (if not most of) the people pulling this crap aren't even marginalized people. No, they're so-called "allies".
I'm not a marginalized person, but I think that with allies like those... etc..
no subject
I'm not a marginalized person, but I think that with allies like those... etc..
Oops, I actually do qualify as a marginalized person. I have Cerebral Palsy, but I didn't find out about that until 2010 (and I'm probably older than a lot of the parents of the folks who post here, so... yeah). I can "pass" as "normal", so even though I am technically a marginalized person, I've never felt that particular stigma.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-31 07:09 am (UTC)(link)