[ SECRET POST #2188 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2188 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 102 secrets from Secret Submission Post #313.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Of course, then there's the question about bisexual people who AREN'T attracted to folks outside the gender binary, being made to feel bad about themselves. I am bi and attracted to people on all parts of the spectrum except the far extreme of American "male" (and that's mostly due to past baggage with hyper-macho men). But I also know people who identify as bisexual but would only want to date someone who identified as either male or female, and whose sex matched their gender.

And I see nothing wrong with that. Pansexual forces those people OUT of that box. It is no better than telling a homosexual that they must be heterosexual, or vice versa.

Let people choose how they want to identify themselves. I mean, sure, some words don't deserve to be reclaimed. But something that has a perfectly valid neutral meaning doesn't need to be destroyed based solely on it being un-inclusive. IMO.