case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-12-29 02:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #2188 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2188 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 102 secrets from Secret Submission Post #313.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
thene: Fang, Vanille and the space between them. (awakened)

[personal profile] thene 2012-12-30 04:04 am (UTC)(link)
I have no problem with people who ID as pansexual and I don't think that doing so is per se biphobic (although some of the reasons people state for doing so are biphobic), but I do find it ironic that I've seen people say they've adopted it due to it having 'less baggage' than bisexual, when in fact it has simply acquired different baggage.

One thing I don't get is, out there in the real world I've known nonbinary people (and trans* people in general) who've dated partners all over the orientation spectrum? Especially when they do what you describe in your comment and extend that rhetorical inclusivity to all trans* people, it starts seeming odd to me...trans* is not a gender, and defining it as such makes it sound like you have a kink for trans* people.