[ SECRET POST #2188 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2188 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 102 secrets from Secret Submission Post #313.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

It makes me wonder if we need not invent new terms to distinguish homosexual people who could be attracted to both cisgender and transgender members of their gender vs those who are only interested in cisgender people, and the same for heterosexual people. Actually, I don't really wonder that at all because that would be stupidly complicated and completely unnecessary for regular, everyday social interaction.

[(Anonymous)]

I am a ciswoman who is largely attracted to genderless individuals.

I call myself bisexual. I have had happy, communicative relationships with a range of individuals on a spectrum of gender from almost entire neutral to strongly woman-indentified to moderately strong male-identified, both cis and trans. I called myself bi with them.

To the best of my knowledge not a single one of them felt that I was excluding them from my identity and insulting our relationship by calling myself that.

We don't need new terms. We need to come to accept that the terms that exist cover a broad array and range of possibilities and that each time we create a new term the only damn thing we're doing is pigeonholing people further and further and forcing them to choose an identity that may or may not be theirs, or may not be theirs in a decade's time)

(and, no, I don't believe orientation is a choice. I DO believe, however, that it can change overtime, both actually, and in a more metaphorical sense as people come to accept themselves or see more of the world.)