[ SECRET POST #2188 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2188 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 102 secrets from Secret Submission Post #313.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I might. But some of the SJW tactics I've seen don't look like straight-up trolling to me at all. They look like rat-fucking, which is an old Republican party term for posing as the opposition and then doing things that attract negative attention from the public at large.

It first occurred to me that some of the SJWs sounded like conservatives in disguise when I heard about their reviling interracial marriage. Then other things, like the fact that they're ... unwilling? unable? to actually say what their side stands for or why they're speaking out against [whatever] made more sense. Saboteurs don't want to give anyone who doesn't know about the ideology of the group they're infiltrating reasons to agree with it. They want it to stay off-putting and foreign.

The other thing that really struck me was how much the SJW tone had in common with the way right wing pundits argue and harangue. The left has a tradition of I'm educated being a badge of honor. You establish your credentials in the group by speaking eloquently, not by making emotional appeals. And there's sort of a ... "first person to be reduced to insults and rage loses" rule. This is not the case in activist safe spaces, where venting is allowed, but it is very much the case in terms of how they present themselves to the world at large. Liberals, even radical liberals, believe in educating and convincing people that the world should change in X, Y, and Z ways.

TL;DR Bullying, threatening, and mobbing are all antithetical to improving the way the majority feels about any mistreated minority. A person who actually wants to help the cause they're acting as a spokesperson for should know this. So I'm not sure what they SJWs game is, but when I can't tell the difference between [whatever they are] and intentional sabotage, there's something very wrong.

[kittenmommy]

So I'm not sure what they SJWs game is, but when I can't tell the difference between [whatever they are] and intentional sabotage, there's something very wrong.

YES.

[fuchsiascreams]

What the fuck? Why the hell would they be against interracial marriage?

[(Anonymous)]

The gist was that it was bad because the white person *must* be fetishizing the POC. Who is only in the relationship because of internalized self-hate. Seriously, it was a fucking train wreck of offensive assumptions. But it had the one, positive effect of breaking the SJWs credibility, in the eyes of a lot of people who'd been cutting them slack, before.