[ SECRET POST #2188 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2188 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 102 secrets from Secret Submission Post #313.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[thene]

Yyyyeah something about the inclusivity issue being applied only to bisexuals doesn't feel right to me. Like we're being held, en masse, to a litmus test that monosexuals are not. And meanwhile, genderqueer people are out there dating all kinds of people - including lesbians, gays and straights. It's not like pansexual-identified people own genderqueers' underwear, so I'm not sure why they'd be held up as the One True Inclusive Identity.

Unless, you know, we were caring more about terminology than about what people actually do with their lives IRL.