[ SECRET POST #2189 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2189 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 084 secrets from Secret Submission Post #313.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Some of them did apparently have a written record of themselves; there's a book called History of the Kings of Britain that's supposedly a translation from the ancient Welsh (aka one of the original British dialects), by one Geoffrey of Monmouth, of a history of, well, the kings of Britain pre-Roman invasion. By all accounts the book was somewhat messed up when it was translated, by which I mean that the book which was translated wasn't perfectly accurate, unsurprising considering the age of the purported original volume; but it's the only primary source I can think of that you might be able to get your hands on. Some scholars call it a medieval forgery, but there's sufficient evidence that this isn't true that said accusation can be reasonably safely discounted, though the accuracy of the account itself is of course questionable as with all ancient histories.

[(Anonymous)]

BRB, LOLing at the idea that Geoffy M was anywhere near reliable FOREVER.

[(Anonymous)]

Are you lol'ing because you think he invented it all out of his head, or at the idea that the book itself is accurate? Because the second is fair game, but the first is kinda ridiculous.

[(Anonymous)]

see also the Tysilio Chronicle