Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-01-02 06:55 pm
[ SECRET POST #2192 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2192 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

[Tales of the Abyss]
__________________________________________________
13.

[Merlin, RPS]
__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

[Lilo & Stitch]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 032 secrets from Secret Submission Post #313.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-03 01:37 am (UTC)(link)(once again this only applies to white-majority countries though. other countries have different dynamics.)
no subject
There is also admittedly a truth that a lot of people don't care about things that don't directly affect them. Which is where the proper definition of privilege certainly applies: What's foreign to folks doesn't always get noticed by them. Which means people can be dismissive or even hostile when these subjects are introduced. I think that's where discretion comes in: misapplied or mistimed discussions can have an overall negative effect in what you are trying to convey.
This is not the "tone" argument. This is the "know your audience" one.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-03 01:57 am (UTC)(link)however, for the part about that statement: it probably wasn't necessary the second time, you're right. i wasn't planning to put it again after that. but as someone who's lived in non-white-majority countries, it does annoy me a lot when people act like those are the only type of societies that exist and outright dismiss any alternative perspectives.
i just wanted to add a clarifier instead of ignoring a huge percentage of the world. but now that i reread it, you're right, the second time i added it did come off as pretty patronising and i'm sorry for that.
no subject
I'd put forth that while you certainly don't have to become something like, well, me... you don't have to bend over backwards and be ultra cautious either. As you realize, that can look bad itself. But more individually, you can end up stressing over what you say so much you forget to, you know, have fun in places like this.