fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2194 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2194 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

[The Hobbit]

__________________________________________________

03.

[Good Omens / Girls Next Door]

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

[The Hobbit, Thorin Oakenshield]

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

07. [SPOILERS for Wreck-it Ralph]
http://www.abload.de/img/974137-king_candywrecfbk7z.png
[linked because porn, illustrated]

__________________________________________________

08. [SPOILERS for The Office]

__________________________________________________

09. [SPOILERS for Monsters, Inc.]

__________________________________________________

10. [SPOILERS for The Hobbit]

__________________________________________________

[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

11. [WARNING for incest]

__________________________________________________

12. [WARNING for suicide]

[One Direction]

__________________________________________________

13. [WARNING for shotacon]

__________________________________________________

14. [WARNING for sexual harassment?]

__________________________________________________

15. [WARNING for depression, suicide]

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #313.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

"You can come up with conspiracy theories and everything, but for prosecutors to take a case to trial, you have to have substantial evidence, you have to have evidence that can be presented. And in this case, I don't believe there is much more," Steubenville police Chief William McCafferty said.

He said he believes his town, and his force, have been portrayed unfairly.

"I think they have made our community look like something that its not. It's a very good community," he said. "Nobody condones rape, nobody condones lawlessness."

But McCafferty also said he's puzzled why no one intervened in the alleged assaults.

"Why didn't somebody stop it?" he said. "You simply don't do that. ... It's not done."

How can he say that with a straight face?! How the fuck does he think rapists get away with it?! I bet he would change his tune if it was his daughter who went through this. Oh, or maybe he would be the type to want to cover it up to avoid the shame, never mind that the rapists would walk free

argh fuck this is pissing me off

He has a point about evidence and the innocent until proven guilty thing. That applies to all felonies and it's a fundamental tenet of civilized society that you simply don't throw someone in jail for something you can't prove they did.

But the rest of his comments are really irritating. Yeah, maybe if you made more of an effort making sure women don't get raped in the first place, that they have proper resources to collect this evidence you keep talking about, that they are listened to and taken seriously every time they report it and are encouraged to report it, a big enough fuss and strong enough condemnation of rapists is raised that rapists don't feel like they can get away with it, and that rapists are given penalties harsh enough to scare them off and/or keep them the hell out of society, maybe you'd have more success with your so-called "good community".

na

He has a point about evidence and the innocent until proven guilty thing. That applies to all felonies and it's a fundamental tenet of civilized society that you simply don't throw someone in jail for something you can't prove they did.

Hell, in this case you don't even have that since the people who did it bragged about doing it on camera. The people in this town trying to cover it over are all kinds of fucked up (it reminds me a lot of a similar incident in a texas town a couple of years ago. Looks like no one learned a damn thing)

The problem is that in a lot of rape cases that are reported, even if all logical evidence stacks against the rapist, prosecutors will still try and claim it was the victim's fault. About a year or so ago, there was a rape case on trial where they said that the woman "couldn't" have been raped because her jeans were "too tight" to have been removed by somebody other than her.

So, yeah, "innocent until proven guilty" in the case of rape often ends up being "innocent because we say so." It's disgusting.

[ SECRET POST #2194 ]

WHAT THE EVER LOVING FUCK

Re: WHAT THE EVER LOVING FUCK

Re: WHAT THE EVER LOVING FUCK

Re: WHAT THE EVER LOVING FUCK