case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-01-16 06:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #2206 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2206 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12. [tb 1]


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15. [see thread]


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #315.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
greenvelvetcake: (wut)

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake 2013-01-17 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
...As someone who draws humanized ponies with zero ulterior motive or desire to see pony porn, I am displeased and bemused.

OP

(Anonymous) 2013-01-17 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry that you get caught up in the broad net so many of your fellow fanartists have created in my mind.

So, change my opinion - show me some of your stuff, or other non-pervy humanized ponies. Please. I beg you. Show me where I can go to raise my opinion of my fellow pony fans again!
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

Re: OP

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2013-01-17 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
OP CONFIRMED FOR WANTING PONY PORN.
greenvelvetcake: (Default)

Re: OP

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake 2013-01-17 02:23 am (UTC)(link)
But... but it's not very good. At all. The quality, not the content.

(Anonymous) 2013-01-17 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
Er, um, ah...

What of all the humanized pony art that isn't porn?
visp: (Default)

[personal profile] visp 2013-01-17 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, this.

(Anonymous) 2013-01-17 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
All of the non-porny humanized art I've seen has the ponies with DD+ breasts. They may be wearing clothes but since there isn't one of them that is drawn flatchested, well...It is there. :x
ryttu3k: (Default)

[personal profile] ryttu3k 2013-01-17 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
Here. From the first page of results on dA for 'my little pony gijinka'. I'm not a MLP fan, and even I've seen plenty of respectful, creative, flat-out fun gijinka.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-17 03:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] ryttu3k - 2013-01-18 12:24 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-01-17 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
idk where you're looking since 90% of humanized pony art that I've seen has them with A-C boobs.

OP

(Anonymous) 2013-01-17 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
There's damned little of it that's not scantily clad, or making a big deal out of their relative breast sizes. Even when it's not porn, it's still all about making them "sexy".

There's some that avoids that, true, but like I said in the secret, not nearly enough to change my opinion.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2013-01-17 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
you need to start following more awesome artists and less pandering ones, then (same goes for anon above)

http://spader7.deviantart.com/art/My-Little-Delinquents-213553936

http://explosivegent.deviantart.com/art/Crepuscular-in-Nature-275465971

http://aquafeles.deviantart.com/art/MLP-Not-ponies-206656686

http://boxdrink.deviantart.com/art/two-princesses-209063220

seriously, I'm looking at the "more like this" section and seeing tons of cool non creepy/fetishistic fanart

there are so many artists out there that steering away from the creepiness is feasible

mind, you are right that it's annoying that the creepiness is there and that there is so much of it, but painting all fanartists under the same brush is insulting.

like, I'm only seeing 2 here that could count as sexualized here:

http://browse.deviantart.com/?qh=§ion=&global=1&q=human+ponies

I've seen worse fandoms for fanart is all I'm saying

(might I suggest you avoid tumblr though [or at least be super selective about which blogs you check out]? there's tons of pony nsfw art there, which I've unfortunately seen first-hand orz)

Re: OP

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake - 2013-01-17 02:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: OP

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-17 02:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: OP

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-17 02:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: OP

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-17 02:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: OP

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-17 06:18 (UTC) - Expand

anon whom the anon you replied to replied to

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-17 06:43 (UTC) - Expand

not the anon whom the anon you replied to replied to

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-17 06:50 (UTC) - Expand
nachtmusik: (No. Nein. Nyet. Non.)

Re: OP

[personal profile] nachtmusik 2013-01-17 05:18 am (UTC)(link)
...You had better not be trying to say that drawing a girl with big breasts is automatically sexualizing her.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-17 07:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: OP

[personal profile] nachtmusik - 2013-01-17 13:30 (UTC) - Expand
ryttu3k: (Default)

[personal profile] ryttu3k 2013-01-17 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
Does that go for Pokemon gijinka? I've only drawn them a few times, but I have nearly five hundred saved. Not a single one is even remotely smutty. I mean, look at stuff like this! That's gorgeous-looking. It's also humanified Pokemon.

(Chingling and Chimecho, if anyone wants to compare.)

(Anonymous) 2013-01-17 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
I've seen very little pokemon fanart in general, to be honest, so I haven't had a chance to form an opinion of them, so, no, not really.

(no subject)

[personal profile] ryttu3k - 2013-01-18 12:21 (UTC) - Expand
kamino_neko: Tedd from El Goonish Shive. Drawn by Dan Shive, coloured by Kamino Neko. (Default)

[personal profile] kamino_neko 2013-01-17 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
Gijinka. That's a term I've never heard before. Interesting.

(no subject)

[personal profile] ryttu3k - 2013-01-18 12:24 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-01-17 08:02 pm (UTC)(link)
If you didn't say it was pokemon, I would've thought it was Vocaloid (Miku & Rin).

(no subject)

[personal profile] ryttu3k - 2013-01-18 12:25 (UTC) - Expand
eaten_by_bears: Rodimus Prime, I am sick and tired of being responsible for the welfare of the entire universe and its outlying suburbs (Default)

[personal profile] eaten_by_bears 2013-01-17 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
Hee, what's your explanation for drawing them as squid and cuttlefish, then?

I figure most of it's that they're fun characters, and it's fun to mess with them. Folk who like the pony-pussy mostly just draw the pony-pussy straight up.
kamino_neko: Tedd from El Goonish Shive. Drawn by Dan Shive, coloured by Kamino Neko. (Default)

[personal profile] kamino_neko 2013-01-17 01:30 am (UTC)(link)
Hee, what's your explanation for drawing them as squid and cuttlefish, then?

... That's a thing? Since both of those things freak me out, I'm glad I haven't seen it, but...that's a thing? I've seen kitties, puppies, and dragons, which all make sense - switching one cute thing/fantasy creature for another - but...replacing them with 'evil abomination from beyond all the hells', that's something else. (Why, yes, I have one hell of a cephalopod phobia, why do you ask?)

(no subject)

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake - 2013-01-17 02:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] kamino_neko - 2013-01-17 02:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-17 02:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] eaten_by_bears - 2013-01-17 03:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-17 18:46 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-01-17 01:55 am (UTC)(link)
Folk who like the pony-pussy mostly just draw the pony-pussy straight up.

There's a distressing amount of that, too, yes.

See, the porny humanized art just makes me think the artist was thinking "I want to fap to these characters, but they're horses. I'll make them human to make it socially acceptable." And since the vast majority of the humanized stuff I've seen has been, if not outright porny, at least extremely focused on how sexy the girls are, it's coloured my view of all of it.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-17 05:48 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-01-17 03:23 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, okay.

I'll be over here drawing them as anthropomorphic but non-sexualized ponies, mostly because their four-legged anatomy makes my brain explode whenever I try to draw it.
shukivengeance: (Default)

[personal profile] shukivengeance 2013-01-17 04:36 am (UTC)(link)
Even when it's not porn?
otakugal15: (B/)

[personal profile] otakugal15 2013-01-17 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)
....wat.

I've drawn humanized ponies. In non-porn situations because I don't draw porn.

Not every humanized pony artist wants porn of them.

B/
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2013-01-17 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
...virtually all of the humanized pony art is not porny

/late to this party