case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-01-17 06:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #2207 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2207 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 023 secrets from Secret Submission Post #315.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-01-18 03:52 am (UTC)(link)
Just out of curiosity, but on the part of the author, wouldn't it actually be less labour intensive to put up a warning rather than field questions? It's usually two words to a sentence more in the header, rather than replying to individual questions one at a time.

Because in the absence of warnings, people will have to ask. So they're going to be telling people anyway, why not up front and at the start?

(Anonymous) 2013-01-18 01:38 pm (UTC)(link)
It is even easier to just ignore any whining "questions" about triggers and not respond to them.

(Anonymous) 2013-01-18 02:55 pm (UTC)(link)
...Thus making it impossible for readers with triggers to accept the "onus of responsibility" and find out what fics contain before reading them. Brilliant.

(Anonymous) 2013-01-18 09:15 pm (UTC)(link)
The onus of responsibility starts when the ipad connects to the router. Once they've taken the decision to do that, it is all on them.

(Anonymous) 2013-01-19 04:15 pm (UTC)(link)
So you're saying that no one with triggers should ever read fic or participate in fandom?