[ SECRET POST #2210 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2210 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 101 secrets from Secret Submission Post #316.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[kallanda_lee]

It really isn't?

I mean, yes, directors *direct* your acting, amongst other things, but it's not really a power imbalance relationship, or it certainly does not have to be.
It's generally not a director who has the power to fire or hire you, especially once you've already been cast. It's not like your main star is going to be laid off halfway shooting because he won't smooch the director.

(Actually, it's more common for assistant directors to "climb up" through affairs with directors, than for actors)

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

Well, maybe not. I'm not familiar with the industry, so I wouldn't know. But weren't people finding it skeevy when Kristen Stewart's director had an affair with her? Or was he a producer? Or was that only about the various infidelities involved?

Whatever. It hits skeevy buttons for me.

[(Anonymous)]

I thought it was such a big deal because they were both cheating on their significant others. Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson were a big name couple, and the director had a wife and kids...

[(Anonymous)]

No one cared about the age difference between Stewart and that Snow White movie director, most of the rage was against Stewart and 'HDU CHEAT ON THE GOD THAT IS RPATTZ'.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm pretty sure some of the people in the epic discussion here cared about it.