[ SECRET POST #2210 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2210 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 101 secrets from Secret Submission Post #316.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Uh, no it's not? Downs Syndrome is at least something people can function with, but "risk of disorder in your child when you get pregnant later in life" is a perfectly valid warning. It's not about having the perfect child, but some disorders lead to a very painful, short life, and the risk of that is important. If you're any kind of parent at all, you should consider it.

[(Anonymous)]

I totally agree with everything you're saying, I am not trying to deny scientific fact. It is something to take into consideration.

But the general tone reflected to me by the original comment (and apparently others) that allowing oneself to have a child with Down's is somehow irresponsible denigrates the personhood of the child and suggests that such a child would be a workload, not a family member.

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, I see. No worries then--I must have misinterpreted your comment. :)