[ SECRET POST #2213 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2213 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #316.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - request for assistance ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[wldcatsprstr_14]

If you feel that deep a love for someone, so deep that you're practically lovers without the actual 'loving' part, then I consider that a homoromantic relationship. Obviously not all bromances are that deep, but some are and they don't invalidate the relationship that two asexuals may have by being so. That's almost on the same level as saying that gay love somehow invalidates hetero love because it's somehow doesn't 'belong' to them.

And even if a homoromantic doesn't go that deep, it can still count. You wouldn't say two people don't have a sexual relationship because they've only ever done oral and never actually put tab A in slot B (or rubbed slot A against slot A, etc). Relationships are relative and very by degrees.

That word 'actual' gives the impression that you're somehow able to decide what constitutes romance or love. A shallow homoromantic relationship between two asexuals isn't automatically worth more than a homoromantic relationship between two close friends just because they're asexuals.

[nan]

That word 'actual' gives the impression that you're somehow able to decide what constitutes romance or love.

lol no, but I do have an opinion about what constitutes romance. But! I concede that romantic friendships exist and it's not my place to define it for other people. You would know better than me whether these dudes consider themselves to be in a homoromantic relationship or not.

And now I'm going to wander off to tumblr since I'm apparently an angry ace tonight.