case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-01-27 02:39 pm

[ SECRET POST #2217 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2217 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12. [ns]


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________

















Notes:

Early because sick, sorry.

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 097 secrets from Secret Submission Post #317.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-01-27 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
False. Pratchett and Gaiman are both pretty tedious, and I felt like Good Omens is hysterical in a Douglas Adams Does Angels and Demons kind of way. It has very tight writing, and it kept me in tears of laughter.

I can't even slog through a few pages of Prachett's work and don't even get me started on the self-important blowhardedness that is American Gods.
thene: Happy Ponyo looking up from the seabed (Default)

[personal profile] thene 2013-01-27 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
sorry anon but i genuinely wonder if people who hate discworld even have souls

(Anonymous) 2013-01-28 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
SA

It's not that I don't like the miniseries or his humor, it's that I find it extremely difficult to begin his books to read the books.
thene: "'The spirit is a garden,' said he." Photograph from ColinPurrington.com (snowdrops of gratuitous self-reference)

[personal profile] thene 2013-01-28 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
I think it took a while for him to find his groove - Mort is the only early Discworld book that is good - but he is just one of those wonderful sincere funny-people who the world would not be the same without, ;___;
blueonblue: (Default)

[personal profile] blueonblue 2013-01-28 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
They may have been given the wrong book to start with. I remember picking up a copy of Wyrd Sisters at the Swiss Cottage library and falling asleep in a very uncomfortable chair. A couple of years later someone gave me a copy of Mort and then I went through and read them all in publication order.
thene: Happy Ponyo looking up from the seabed (Default)

[personal profile] thene 2013-01-28 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, there is no way to start a Discworld argument like asking which book to read first. XD I started with Men At Arms, which I still think is a pretty good place to dive in, as is Witches Abroad, which was my second. Mort is my usual suggestion though.

(Anonymous) 2013-01-28 06:02 am (UTC)(link)
I started with Colour of Magic (which I didn't like AT ALL). A couple of years later, I bought Night Watch on a whim and LOVED it. Night Watch is a perfect blend of action and humour, with added commentary on policing and governance! Personally, I'd recommend Night Watch just because I honestly think that if the reader doesn't like Night Watch, they can't possibly like any other Discworld book.

(Anonymous) 2013-01-28 03:12 am (UTC)(link)
DA, I read one of the Discworld books and it was entirely unremarkable... I'm not even going to bother with the rest, even if some might be better, because there are far too many books in the world that I'm curious about.
republicanism: (Default)

[personal profile] republicanism 2013-01-28 04:00 am (UTC)(link)
i am of the opinion that there is at least 1 discworld book for everyone. i've definitely liked some a lot more than others.

anything where Death is one of the main focuses tend to be my favorite. now that im thinking about it i want to get back into discworld again. dammit
thene: Happy Ponyo looking up from the seabed (Default)

[personal profile] thene 2013-01-28 04:08 am (UTC)(link)
It's Granny Weatherwax, for me. Mm, some of them are duds, but considering how MANY there are it's a pretty damn consistent series. My favourite part of it tends to be the run between roughly Lords and Ladies and Night Watch, excepting Jingo and The Truth obviously. There are just so many amazingly on-target books in there.

(Anonymous) 2013-01-28 04:52 am (UTC)(link)
I usually introduce people to the series with Guards, Guards, myself.
thene: Happy Ponyo looking up from the seabed (Default)

[personal profile] thene 2013-01-28 05:24 am (UTC)(link)
I like Guards! Guards!, but I've found there's this odd pattern where people mostly seem to only like it if they read it after Men At Arms, as I did. I feel like it's more fun after the point where he's got the characters completely down.

(Anonymous) 2013-01-28 07:28 am (UTC)(link)
A passing by nonny would like to say they started with The Colour of Magic and Men At Arms, but is not sure if it supports your point or not.
andromedary: (Default)

[personal profile] andromedary 2013-01-28 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
Aw, I liked American Gods well enough. But Good Omens definitely appeals to me more all-around, and is the only book that's ever made me cry from laughing - the "Best of Queen" phenomenon and Crowley getting a message in the middle of Bohemian Rhapsody still kills me every time. Douglas Adams is a good comparison!

(Anonymous) 2013-01-28 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
DA, you just convinced me to move Good Omens to the top of my TBR list.