Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-01-28 06:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #2218 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2218 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 079 secrets from Secret Submission Post #317.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Pentagon lifting ban on American female troops in combat MOS
Do you not understand why some (hell, a lot) of men wouldn't have an issue with 'you pretty much have to serve, women on the otherhand can take it or leave it'? Really?
And no, that's not my point. Your military has substantially less experience, less influence, and is less central to the realpolitik your country engages in then ours. I'm making no moral judgement there, but the comparison would be something like 'well in Vardø the police function this way, why don't they in the Met or NYPD?'.
Re: Pentagon lifting ban on American female troops in combat MOS
We think of it like any other job where the genders aren't equal, men have a right to a job over a equally qualified woman in a female oriented job and women in jobs where men are the majority.
I wasn't really serious in my last comment, but if that is how you want to play it: The Norwegian Military, even if it is small and isn't as big as The British or American military, still are a well trained and organized Military force, with modern equipment and though smaller than quite a few other military forces, no less equipped to handle any combat situations. And also we got the economical power to replace whatever equipment we need to (the latest was new fighter jets if I remember correctly)
And Norway have or had military personnel fighting alongside yours in Iraq and in Afghanistan and during the war in Kosovo in the 90s and so on. (and lost people, so even if we might focus on the peace keeping forces we do send people into active war zones)
So no we might not be as powerful as your military (but why do we need a big military, we got NATO for that), but we do influence politics, and economics, and probably the most relevant to this discussion: Peace Making
Re: Pentagon lifting ban on American female troops in combat MOS
And no, the sheer disparity in the realities of our forces is entirely relevant. It to a large part explains why our countries are so much more reticent to change things, and go tinkering about, and why there is less of a political will to do so.