case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-01-28 06:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #2218 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2218 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 079 secrets from Secret Submission Post #317.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Pentagon lifting ban on American female troops in combat MOS

(Anonymous) 2013-01-29 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
I will definitely look into that, though I don't know yet how willing I'd be to participate if they even wanted me to. Thank you for the link, regardless. I am absolutely fascinated by other women's experiences in the military and will give it serious consideration.

What specifically are you studying? My training and work as an intel analyst necessitated I learn a staggering amount of military history, sadly more than I can remember. But my interest has never faded and there's always something new to learn. I can still map out D-Day perfectly but I can't remember the maps of The Six Day War or the name of the woman who was behind the V2 rocket or even how many operatives were involved in Operation Wrath of God :( I'm rambling, but my point is that despite my inability to retain certain really cool facts, I still love learning military and intelligence history because it's just so interesting. There's a good chance that whatever you're studying is something I know little or nothing about and it might be the next thing I take up reading about because I'm almost out of books to read and haven't decided what to start on next.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Pentagon lifting ban on American female troops in combat MOS

[personal profile] chardmonster 2013-01-29 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I can't get too into specifics (project might be googled) but I'm starting a dissertation about women in uniformed organizations (so both official military and paramilitary clubs) during the World Wars. Recently I've mostly been working on the WAC.

It sounds like you're into strategic stuff; my interests are more cultural! But you might be interested in this. Probably the best source on the WAC that you can get easily online is Mattie Treadwell's official history:
  • http://www.history.army.mil/books/wwii/Wac/index.htm


  • It's biased, obviously--Treadwell was a WAC officer herself--but she does a really good job.

    Bookwise Creating GI Jane
  • http://www.amazon.com/Creating-G-Jane-Leisa-Meyer/dp/0231101457
  • and Mobilizing Minerva (WWI)
  • http://www.amazon.com/Mobilizing-Minerva-American-Women-First/dp/0252074963/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpt_1
  • are both really important in my field and fun to read.

    I don't know if you have university library access, but if you ever want someone to send you a JSTOR pdf or anything like that I'd be happy to. I love talking about this stuff!