fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2225 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2225 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

15. [repeat]

__________________________________________________

16.

__________________________________________________

17.

__________________________________________________

18.

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 084 secrets from Secret Submission Post #318.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - take it to comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

+1 on finding rigorously-written histories. David McCullough is one of the only popular historians I've seen who does this consistently and well.

But Stephen Ambrose! I love him. I used a sizable amount of his (earlier) work in my thesis, and subsequently had to defend my choice to cite a discredited historian's work (sigh).

Oh yeah, it's annoying as heck. I'm not sure what happened to him. : /

How'd you defend yourself? Was it Citizen Soldiers?

[ SECRET POST #2225 ]

OT

Re: OT