Jasmine is pretty and all, but her face is a lot more abstract and cartoony than Ariel.
Jasmine's face is simply cartoon pretty woman, and as I recall, she is NOT based on any real person, unlike Ariel, and I'm not sure if Jasmine had a actress motion reference as I know Ariel did. Her animation is simply more detailed, more refined and humanlike. Pocahontas has a far more realistic human face than Jasmine. Jasmine's face lacks definition or proportions.
Belle, Rapunzel, and Cinderella also looks similarly abstract, but I think no princess has ever had a more abstract cartoon face than Jasmine. Her eyes take up such a huge part of her face. This is not to say that Ariel is realistic, but rather, that Jasmine is very caricatured.
But oh my goooood raciiisssm. Be a bit more creative!
no subject
I don't know how someone can honestly think most people think this:
http://images4.fanpop.com/image/photos/22300000/Ariel-Wallpaper-disney-princess-22331194-1011-1342.png
is less realistic than this:
http://images5.fanpop.com/image/photos/29700000/Princess-Jasmine-disney-princess-29762439-259-300.jpg
Jasmine is pretty and all, but her face is a lot more abstract and cartoony than Ariel.
Jasmine's face is simply cartoon pretty woman, and as I recall, she is NOT based on any real person, unlike Ariel, and I'm not sure if Jasmine had a actress motion reference as I know Ariel did. Her animation is simply more detailed, more refined and humanlike. Pocahontas has a far more realistic human face than Jasmine. Jasmine's face lacks definition or proportions.
Belle, Rapunzel, and Cinderella also looks similarly abstract, but I think no princess has ever had a more abstract cartoon face than Jasmine. Her eyes take up such a huge part of her face. This is not to say that Ariel is realistic, but rather, that Jasmine is very caricatured.
But oh my goooood raciiisssm. Be a bit more creative!