[ SECRET POST #2232 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2232 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14. [broken link]


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #319.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Both characters are cartoonish. It's just that one of them has huge, cartoonish eyes that are an exaggeration of more Caucasian features and the other has huge, cartoonish eyes that are an exaggeration of more Western Asiatic features.

And yes, I'm totally giving you the side-eye for finding one more "realistic" and "human-ish" and the other unreal and presumably less human.

[(Anonymous)]

I know you are, because it's really easy to snort and huff and scream racist. As I said above:

I don't know how someone can honestly think most people think this:

http://images4.fanpop.com/image/photos/22300000/Ariel-Wallpaper-disney-princess-22331194-1011-1342.png

is less realistic than this:

http://images5.fanpop.com/image/photos/29700000/Princess-Jasmine-disney-princess-29762439-259-300.jpg

Jasmine is pretty and all, but her face is a lot more abstract and cartoony than Ariel.

Jasmine's face is simply cartoon pretty woman, and as I recall, she is NOT based on any real person, unlike Ariel, and I'm not sure if Jasmine had a actress motion reference as I know Ariel did. Her animation is simply more detailed, more refined and humanlike. Pocahontas has a far more realistic human face than Jasmine. Jasmine's face lacks definition or proportions.

Belle, Rapunzel, and Cinderella also looks similarly abstract, but I think no princess has ever had a more abstract cartoon face than Jasmine. Her eyes take up such a huge part of her face. This is not to say that Ariel is realistic, but rather, that Jasmine is very caricatured.

But oh my goooood raciiisssm. Be a bit more creative!

[(Anonymous)]

Jasmine's face was based on that of an animator's sister. Motion capture has little to do with facial features so it doesn't matter if her motion had an actual actress behind it or not.

[(Anonymous)]

It has to do with the realism and believability of a character, which I also discussed.

I'll point out that Mark Henn's sister is white, so...it's funny you claimed I was racist.

[(Anonymous)]

Actually that was a DA, some of us forget to mark it sometimes. You were talking only about her face as a realistically human one, nothing about 'believability' and character, so nice try at goalpost moving but no dice.