Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-02-12 06:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #2233 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2233 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 054 secrets from Secret Submission Post #319.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
1. I have no idea what you're talking about. Link? Or if this is just about you wanting to re-hash an argument, just reply to whichever comment of mine you disliked, and I'll get an email notification of it, and get back to you on that.
2. That doesn't even sound like a SJ topic. The standard rule is 'choice' and so whatever the choice is, is her business. And if she didn't want the child but didn't want (or couldn't get) an abortion, she still could have given it for adoption, so there's no point in chiding her for not aborting.
3. I'm not sure what a view on abortion or being childfree or any of that has to do with pointing out that trying to make demographic statements on an internet subculture is a little silly, considering the anonymous nature of the internet. They could be sentient pandas for all you know.
4. I don't know what you do with your underpants, but I wear mine, well, under my pants, and generally do not display my undergarments in public, which means that any potential holes would not being showing, embarrassingly or otherwise. Not sure where you're going with that one.