case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-02-15 06:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #2236 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2236 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Inda series]


__________________________________________________



02.
[Les Miserables and Discworld]

__________________________________________________



03.
[Three Kingdoms 2010, Legend of Chu and Han]


__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[DBSK]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion (Shivering Isles)]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________














[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]













09. [SPOILERS for ]

[Umineko no Naku Koro Ni]


__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Supernatural]



__________________________________________________














[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]














11. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



12. [possible warning for sexual assault (as I'm sure the thread will contain discussion of it)]



__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for abuse]



__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for rape, abuse, etc]



__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for suicide]



__________________________________________________



16. [WARNING for eating disorders]



__________________________________________________


17. [WARNING for rape/non-con]

[Homestuck]


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #319.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
saku: (Default)

Re: nayrt

[personal profile] saku 2013-02-16 06:05 am (UTC)(link)
op stating she doesn't "believe you're entitled to your bullshit opinions when they conflict with education, basic reason, and scientific data" made me question what exactly this "scientific data" was that so effectively shut down theistic ideas, given that theism and science are not related or inherently conflicting.

Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) 2013-02-16 06:13 am (UTC)(link)
OP is female? I don't believe OP was speaking about all theistic ideas and the reference to "not being entitled" seems (to me at least) to be a perhaps poorly worded attempt at saying one is not entitled to a disproved opinion or idea when debating an issue. i.e. "Well that's just my opinion" should not be a trump argument. If you want to talk about real world issues you can only do so using facts if you want people to take you seriously and give what you're saying consideration.

I agree science and theism are not necessarily conflicting which is why I drew attention to the fact the OP used the word "conflict".
saku: (Default)

Re: nayrt

[personal profile] saku 2013-02-16 06:16 am (UTC)(link)
i agree that real world issues necessitate facts. i just wasn't under the impression op was only talking about these kinds of issues. it sounded more to me like, in the case of religion, "religious people are dumb for being religious."

Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) 2013-02-16 02:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I took the OP as more meaning that ideas based solely on opinion/gut feeling shouldn't be given a place at the table in important discussions about health/education/welfare/public policy etc. They don't deserve air time, and debate shouldn't have to be structured to include their disproof-adverse ideas.