[ SECRET POST #2238 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2238 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 097 secrets from Secret Submission Post #320.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[tweedisgood]

IA. Dissecting 'Great Expectations' for O level put me off Dickens for...pretty much ever. Shakespeare only survived because I keep making sure to see it on stage.

[(Anonymous)]

For me it depends, because I quite like dissecting things, but yes, some works hold up better than others for two months of exhaustive, collective analysis. I loved Shakespeare in class, because sometimes it's really, really funny watching people react to the revelation that the few lines the teacher just had them read out are, when you know the English of the time, really filthy. Which he kept doing, because Shakespeare apparently enjoyed putting dirty jokes in things. After a couple of classes, people start to catch on, but that's nearly as good to watch.

But Shakespeare on stage is different. We did King Lear, which is pretty good in class, but when we saw it live, the actor playing Edmund made him the most fabulously sleazy character to watch, it gave him a whole other level. When you're reading Shakespeare, you don't realise how pared down the experience is, because even though it's just dialogue it's rather busy dialogue. But then you see it live, and you're reminded that yes, script format takes a lot of things out of the experience ...

[truxillogical]

I wish everyone's first experience to Shakespeare could be seeing it performed live.

(When I lived in London, I was addicted to the Globe. It was seriously A Problem.)

[(Anonymous)]

It was standard in our school (this was Ireland, early oughties). There were a couple of theaters up in the capital (two hours by bus) that used to do a Shakespeare rotation based on what plays were on the state exams that year. So I saw Romeo and Juliet for the junior exams, and then King Lear for the senior exams three years later.

It depended on what school you were in, and I think the theater that did it had to close in 2009, but I happened to be attending the right school at the right time, so I got lucky.