[ SECRET POST #2238 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2238 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 097 secrets from Secret Submission Post #320.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[chardmonster]

I cannot name off the top of my head a person who only likes one very narrowly specified type of book who can claim to be very well read.

[(Anonymous)]

But anon didn't say they were very well read?

Not that it would matter. Just because they prefer a narrow genre of books to read for fun does not mean they're not well read.

i.e fictionwise I basically read post apocalyptic standalones/short series that are not too far in the future with a female main character
Nonfictionwise I read whatever strikes my interest. Biology, Ecology, Astrology, Geography, Linguistics, Anatomy, First aid...and I still wouldn't claim myself to be well read just because I've read and bought quite a few books in each area...and still do.

The identification of "well read" is stupid anyway. Let people read what they want without making judgement calls on what they enjoy! You'd think there was a ban on enjoying oneself.

SA

[(Anonymous)]

I've read all kinds of books. The only kind I cannot really get into are horror-type. Something a little unsettling about gruesome body parts etc.

But I've read Lord of the Flies, 1984, Of Mice and Men, even some Shakespeare, and I also like science fiction and the list goes on.

Re: SA

[(Anonymous)]

2013-02-17 09:05 pm UTC <-- I'm this SA.

[wauwy]

I can't name off the top of my head a person who claims to be well-read who isn't ALSO a douchebag

[chardmonster]

Oh man. You must hate, like, each and every one of your professors.

Also librarians.