[ SECRET POST #2238 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2238 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 097 secrets from Secret Submission Post #320.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[wauwy]

If they weren't a genre, they couldn't have a section in Barnes & Noble. Just sayin'.

Not only do we speak, write, and think differently in contemporary narratives than we do in narratives written 50+ years ago, which gives books a certain "flavor" that can be appetizing or off-putting depending on the reader, the reasons why "classics" are chosen are usually to fulfill certain criteria. Usually socio-historical ones. If you're turned off by a focus on that criteria, you're likely to be turned off by the classics.

[(Anonymous)]

Major bookstore chains also classified graphic novels of all types as "Superheros" before, just sayin'.

I agree that "old" literature can be different in reading comprehension, but what about contemporary classics? Lahiri's "Interpreter of Maladies" and Martel's "Life of Pi" are often on those shelves and in reading lists for schools now. Harry Potter is pretty much considered a classic or classic-to-be if you're using the 50+ years distinction. But my point was that there's really no distinction left. It has become a much wider net than the "old white guys and their problems" classification from before, so there is no agreed upon category to qualify a classic except through popular consensus. And we know how wacky people's opinions can get.