[ SECRET POST #2238 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2238 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 097 secrets from Secret Submission Post #320.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: The obsession over classic literature is kind of ridiculous, honestly

[(Anonymous)]

That's not deconstruction, that's just analysis.

And, yes, it is true that some people, and especially teachers, can go overboard on analysis. At the same time, though, I think there's a tendency for some people to overreact to that. And analysis is in and of itself both good and valid and something that enriches the reading experience. I mean, making points about works by close reading and thought and critical analysis is cool and totally legitimate, as long as you're not getting into scholastic hairsplitting or whatever.

Re: The obsession over classic literature is kind of ridiculous, honestly

[with-rainfall.livejournal.com]

Yes, and I'm talking about deconstruction taken to utterly stupid and unnecessary levels, when the word or phrase someone is analysing is not relevant to the author's message in any way; this is different from close reading in general, which is useful.