Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-02-21 06:09 pm
[ SECRET POST #2242 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2242 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #320.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
And then there's McLaggen, who takes "daring, nerve and chivalry" to all their douchiest possible interpretations.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-22 12:20 am (UTC)(link)and let me be clear: I don't think this is a fault of the work - the world does what it needs to do. It's a marvelously interesting world with a great aesthetic and atmosphere. It's a great setting. It doesn't need to hold up rigorously or have astounding depth, and it mostly doesn't. And the Sorting Hat and the Houses is one of those cases: it provides a great atmosphere, a link to the past that JKR is invoking, and a ready-made dynamic structure for relationships and plot, so the fact that it doesn't really hang together on close examination doesn't matter much.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-22 12:26 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-22 12:36 am (UTC)(link)The reason the houses do not hang together is because the character of each house is not described in a realistic or comprehensive way, and because the book is eternally unclear on what being in a house implies, particularly in relation to moral choice. To put it in more banal terms, the problem is in part (as OP points out) that the definitions of the houses, esp Slytherin (and particularly if you analyze the actions of the Slytherins rather than bromides about how they're ambitious but not necessarily evil [Slughorn excepted ofc]) and Hufflepuff, are never very coherent. So it's difficult to say what the actual character of each house is, based solely on evidence from the books. The definitions given of houses are ambiguous, but the books rely (in a lot of ways) on them NOT being ambiguous - particularly when the books use house as a proxy for morality. Which they totally do, although never in a clear-cut and unambiguous way, adding another layer of confusion to the question.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-22 12:47 am (UTC)(link)LOL omg what is this comment please don't tell me you actually believe this...?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-22 12:52 am (UTC)(link)*pets*
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-22 01:52 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-22 12:29 am (UTC)(link)Reading deeper layers and complexity into what the original author thought was a fairly simple straightforward story has been a staple of fiction since the printing press was invented. It's responsible for entire new genres.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-22 12:37 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-22 12:46 am (UTC)(link)If not, I don't really get what's so "important" about "maintaining distinctions". It's not a sacrosanct political document upon which vital legislation depends on the minute details of its interpretation.
If people's interpretations are ridiculous, people will point and laugh. If their interpretations are good, people will be pleased and it will enhance their enjoyment of the book. And if it's not precisely what JKR was thinking, how is that relevant or important or game-changing in any way? Either way, it's just a nice little fantasy book.