case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-02-22 07:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #2243 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2243 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Evolution]


__________________________________________________



03.
[My Chemical Romance and One Direction]


__________________________________________________



04.
[silence of the lambs]


__________________________________________________



05. http://oi46.tinypic.com/vzc4lk.jpg
[linked for casual nudity; not porn but not the artsy kind either]


__________________________________________________



06. http://i48.tinypic.com/2ivll3b.png
[somewhat sexual photomanip]


__________________________________________________



07. http://i.imgur.com/88IwqTG.jpg
[and this one has naked kim jong il in it]



__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[paranatural]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________












[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]













14. [SPOILERS for Walking Dead]



__________________________________________________



15. [SPOILERS for Super Dangan Ronpa 2]



__________________________________________________



16. [SPOILERS for Pokemon BW 2]



__________________________________________________



17. [SPOILERS for Walking Dead]



__________________________________________________



18. [SPOILERS for Homestuck]



__________________________________________________













[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]














19. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



20. [WARNING for dub-con]

[The Rocketeer]


__________________________________________________



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #320.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - template ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[personal profile] fscom 2013-02-23 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
19. [WARNING for rape]
http://i.imgur.com/45r69HU.png
Edited 2013-02-23 00:15 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
oh no one website isn't willing to indulge someone's weird fetsih oh no

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
CRISIS! On the Internet

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 00:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy - 2013-02-23 01:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] caecilia - 2013-02-23 01:18 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
way to miss the point of this secret

and yeah, rape is such a weird kink, I mean only like 90% women have had rape fantasies in their lifetimes

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
of course it is, anon! don't you know that 120% of women only like doing it in the missionary position with the lights off????

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 02:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 09:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 11:43 (UTC) - Expand
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2013-02-23 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
No, this is the entire fucking point. It's not his website. It's hardly something that's rare.

If the person who runs this decides they don't want rape, why does this matter?

I only think it's judgmental if they are hypocrites about it. Like, used to asks for recs of noncon and now act like they've never been that person. Which isn't what's happening here at all.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2013-02-23 05:17 pm (UTC)(link)
90%? citation?

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
If you search for "raped" instead of "rape", you'll get plenty of results for rape, rapes, raped, raping, rapist, etc.

I think it's a "this word is too common" thing, not a censorship thing.

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
also not a censorship thing because ao3 is not a government institution or legislative body

tragically

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
na

that's not Ao3

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 00:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] charming_stranger - 2013-02-23 03:37 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
i would happily live in the Commonwealth Of AO3

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 00:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 00:48 (UTC) - Expand
fadeinthewash: vintagead-rangeman (Default)

[personal profile] fadeinthewash 2013-02-23 02:52 am (UTC)(link)
also not a censorship thing because ao3 is not a government institution or legislative body

You don't have to be a governing body to censor something. Now, if someone had said AO3 was 'infringing on our free speech' you'd be onto something.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 06:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] fadeinthewash - 2013-02-23 06:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 09:13 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
didn't we have a secret about this exact thing a few months ago

ffnet didn't allow rape as a search term for a while, then they reallowed it and then now I guess they aren't again. I honestly have no idea why you're judging them for it though. It's not a slight against you. and besides, you can still search for "raped" and it brings results that just contain "rape" so it's not even a big fucking deal

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
...if it's not something you're interested in, why are you looking it up?

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly. This secret reminds me of assholes that look up rape, non-con and/or dubcon works, knowing they don't like works dealing with those topics, and decide to shame people over it.

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 04:56 pm (UTC)(link)
maybe they were looking for a specific fic?

da

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-24 08:17 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
Thats fanfiction.net right? I don't know why that would be, I've seen a lot of fics list that in their descriptors. AO3 still has that functionality so you can always go there if you want it, as I see it tagged quite a bit. Fanfiction.net is only really ever useful for rare-pairs i find, and even than it's kinda bottom of the barrel stuff I find. Have you tried finding a kink meme for you fandom? They may have what your looking for.

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:42 am (UTC)(link)
ff.net search function sucks in general so

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
this statement is also accurate if you remove the words "search function"

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 00:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 01:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 02:50 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:51 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly. Although they are good for (badly written) rare-pairs on occasion.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 01:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 11:42 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
maybe it doesn't work because of the SHITLOAD of summaries that contain that word

like, "the", "a", "and", and now "rape"

think about it, OP

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
I thought that's what they were complaining about, the fact that "rape" as a search term has permeated so thickly that it no longer serves to significantly narrow down results.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 02:08 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 09:32 am (UTC)(link)
that's ff.net, right? uh, don't they ban sexually explicit fic anyway? so there's really no point. if a fic mentions rape in a non-explicit way, it's probably not doing it in a kinky fashion. and people who want rape kink probably aren't gonna find much explicit stuff there because I'm sure it's even more likely than regular explicit sex to get reported.

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:03 pm (UTC)(link)
True. Ridiculously, despite the fact that FFNet was where a horrified-yet-fascinated 12 year old me learned a lot about weird sex for the first time, you're not technically allowed to be sexually explicit. So - and I speak as a person with a huge noncon kink, mind you - there's nothing unreasonable in them banning a word which doesn't have any connotations other than the sexually explicit.