case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-02-24 03:21 pm

[ SECRET POST #2245


⌈ Secret Post #2245 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03. [tb]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 098 secrets from Secret Submission Post #321.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 3 4 - come on, troll with a little more subtlety ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Possibly off-topic

[personal profile] thezmage 2013-02-24 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)
If the punch line to that scene hadn't been "it's funny because the pony with Down syndrome thinks that she can help," I would have been fine with it. Probably.

Re: Possibly off-topic

(Anonymous) 2013-02-24 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT

I understand.

I think there's a big difference between joking about disorders and joking about people WITH disorders. One is okay when the focus of the joke isn't mocking or hurting the people behind the jokes. I have severe OCD and I joke about my symptoms a lot because thinking about them in a funny light helps me cope and stay cheerful rather than always thinking about what a crippling disorder it is and how the mini anxiety attacks I get make me miserable.


But mocking the person with the disorders and saying for example "you are autistic and that's bad/wrong" and "lol ass burger" is not cool at all. It's why I hate the term "retarded" being used as an insult.

Re: Possibly off-topic

(Anonymous) 2013-02-24 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm really disturbed at the automatic "SHE HAS DOWN SYNDROME" reaction - I always just saw her as an awkward and adorably klutzy pony o_O Her earnestness in that scene was really cute, IMO...

Re: Possibly off-topic

[personal profile] thezmage 2013-02-24 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Have you heard the original voice? That's what says "Down syndrome" about the character. It wasn't even the slightest bit subtle

Re: Possibly off-topic

(Anonymous) 2013-02-24 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
The original voice was because the VA thought she was a boy.

Re: Possibly off-topic

(Anonymous) 2013-02-25 01:42 am (UTC)(link)
If no one knows that the voice is supposed to telecast "Down syndrome," including the voice actor, then does the voice really telecast "Down syndrome?"

Re: Possibly off-topic

(Anonymous) 2013-02-25 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
If people listen/look at it and think "this pony has down syndrome/a mental disorder"

then yes.

Which is okay until you make her the butt of a joke and have the main characters get angry at her.

especially notable when even the boy ponies don't sound like that.

Re: Possibly off-topic

(Anonymous) 2013-02-25 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
If not all people listen/look at it and think that, then what does that mean? Must we err on the side of those who believe the character to have a mental disorder? If so, why?

Re: Possibly off-topic

(Anonymous) 2013-02-25 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
because if one person with a cause thinks it then they must be right and shame on anyone else for thinking different they're obviously just ableist and in denial/s

Re: Possibly off-topic

(Anonymous) 2013-02-25 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
Who are you singling out, here?

Re: Possibly off-topic

(Anonymous) 2013-02-25 02:24 am (UTC)(link)
Just pointing out that one person thinking something does not make it objectively so. It's one thing to say "she sounds a lot like she has Downs" and another to say "I say she has Downs. It doesn't matter what the VA intended. Because I said so".

That said I did think the voice change was actually good idea.
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

Re: Possibly off-topic

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2013-02-24 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)
See now, I just saw her more as the MLP equivalent of Goofy. Behold the uberklutz, destroyer of all they touch. One part overestimation of competence, one part murphy's law in mortal form.

I mean old school Goofy. Think this (there's even falling through the floor):

http://youtu.be/6jKzr143K8U

I was expecting "dohoho, that Derpy" and "Oh this kinda slapstick is just stupid" to be the conflict. I was honestly shocked when people started saying she was mentally handicapped, though I can see it now.

Though I suppose people might say Goofy is abelist now too.

Edited 2013-02-25 00:43 (UTC)
otakugal15: (B/)

Re: Possibly off-topic

[personal profile] otakugal15 2013-02-25 06:57 am (UTC)(link)
Actually, no. Old!School Goofy MIGHT have a case for that, but New!School Goofy, while dorky, is usually the one who tends to have the most insight with regards to situations than even Mickey or Donald have. Plus, after A Goofy Movie? Anyone who thinks he's an abelist stereotype is fucking reaching and just pulling shit out of their ass to be angry about. All he was, was that awkward parent who wanted to do right by their kid, but didn't automatically realize that their kid was growing up. Which realistically happens.

Ditzy Doo was a straight up stereotype, intentional or not.

Re: Possibly off-topic

(Anonymous) 2013-02-25 01:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Even if you believe Goofy has some variety of cognitive disability, that and his propensity for screwing up aren't the whole of his characterization. (Same for Snips, Snails, Spongebob, and most of the other characters who keep getting cited in these discussions- but Goofy especially, after Goof Troop and the related movies).

Derpy/Ditzy/Bubbles/etc may be given characterization and respect in some of the fan-created content out there, but none of that made it to the screen. To someone who doesn't run in 'brony' spaces, she isn't a loving mother or a competent mailmare or a person with hidden depths, she's just a pony with a voice running uncomfortably close to playground mockery who seems oblivious to the fact that she's repeatedly ruining everything.
otakugal15: (Default)

Re: Possibly off-topic

[personal profile] otakugal15 2013-02-25 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)
This.

Re: Possibly off-topic

(Anonymous) 2013-02-25 01:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Someone's reaching.
otakugal15: (Default)

Re: Possibly off-topic

[personal profile] otakugal15 2013-02-25 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Hahaha.

No.

Butthurt Brony Alert!!!

Re: Possibly off-topic

(Anonymous) 2013-02-25 02:55 pm (UTC)(link)
um, he said specifically "I mean old school Goofy."

Re: Possibly off-topic

(Anonymous) 2013-02-25 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Don't bother, nonny. otakugal has some serious reading comprehension issues.
otakugal15: (B/)

Re: Possibly off-topic

[personal profile] otakugal15 2013-02-25 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Well excuse me for missing ONE thing.

And no. I do not, stalker!non. Go find a life and fuck off.