[ SECRET POST #2245

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2245 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03. [tb]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 098 secrets from Secret Submission Post #321.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 3 4 - come on, troll with a little more subtlety ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

By clicking on the backers link? Says who backed it?

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/566429325/tropes-vs-women-in-video-games/backers

That help?

[chardmonster]

Hmm yes this list of names without any kind of chart or graph breaking them down by gender is Statistics

But if you're right: maybe kickstarter is mostly male?

Maybe her sudden explosion in funding is because so many people were so completely gross about the mere idea of a woman criticizing the portrayal of women in media--most of them had no real criticism of what she said, just FUCK GIRLS LOL--that other people piled on money to prove that they aren't with those idiots and that they're wrong

Wait no it must be because she has boobs

[(Anonymous)]

Didn't mean to imply that, I just find it amusing. Probably something Anita's not going to publicly announce just because it goes against the reality that she's trying to sell to her audience.

[charming_stranger]

Well, what did you mean to imply, then? Just curious.

[(Anonymous)]

Not implying anything, just find it funny.

[diet_poison]

no I think it was the second one

she got so. much. shit. from people; even if you disagreed with her you had to see how gross it was

[(Anonymous)]

The big thing is, I don't care how annoying, "bitchy", "shrill", whatever she is, there is no call - none, for random men on the Internet to gleefully gloat about raping her to put her in "her place" because omfg she's taking a feminist perspective on gaming.

[(Anonymous)]

What about people in the in-between, who find her annoying but don't want her to get raped?

[(Anonymous)]

nayrt

I don't see how that's a problem. Everyone's free find other people annoying. Wanting someone to get raped is a different thing entirely.

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

The thing is, the fact that she's gotten such a totally batshit insane reaction from some male gamer geeks out there suggests to me that she's saying at least something worth considering, and that whatever nerve she's striking exposes that the feminist perspective on gaming is a necessary and proper counterweight to the generally male-centric view of how gaming ought to go.

[thezmage]

Or maybe everybody's a dick here. Being attacked doesn't make someone right, it just means they're being attacked.

[insanenoodlyguy]

I did not know that existed.

I do know I am not going through 139 pages, some of which have completely neutral names and iconography, to try to figure out gender skews.

[(Anonymous)]

I didn't either. Others did.