[ SECRET POST #2245

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2245 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03. [tb]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 098 secrets from Secret Submission Post #321.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 3 4 - come on, troll with a little more subtlety ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

That in no way addresses what I was saying. I'm aware of the Ditzy Doo name and that Lauren later said that she could be that pony. She took off before Lauren said that though, so I don't really see that as an answer to why people were so attached to this.

My question still stands. Why was a joke about an animation error that important to this fandom?

[(Anonymous)]

Why is anything important to any fandom? All fandom revolves around things that are not real. It doesn't matter whether something is an "error" or not; all that matters is that it's always completely and utterly imaginary.

Why is it okay to become attached to something make-believe that someone invented on purpose but it's not okay to become attached to something make-believe that someone invented on accident? Either way, the person is still emotionally invested in a non-entity.

[skepty]

I'm not in that fandom, so I can't say for sure, buttttttt...I think there's a certain charm to one-shot characters, or 'blank slate' characters. People don't get attached to the characters solely on their canonical run, but on the fanon that is created around them. Plus, I think her design is nice. Yellow and Gray pop for me, color wise

[(Anonymous)]

stares in confusion at the carebears gif

[(Anonymous)]

Dark Heart is one of those one-shot characters that people tend to like. It was an example!

[(Anonymous)]

I don't know that I'd call him a 'one-shot'- for all that he never appeared in the TV series, he was virtually the star of the film. There's a pretty big difference between that and a background character.

[(Anonymous)]

He was the villain of the movie and was never mentioned again (If you don't count Noheart basically being a carbon copy of DH...) He may be a (sort of) fan favorite, but he's nowhere near the 'star' of the movie.

[(Anonymous)]

I think its because she (Derpy/Ditzy) isnt supposed to exist. Just like how Bronies 'shouldnt' exist either. It's the irony.