case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-02-28 06:45 pm

[ SECRET POST #2249 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2249 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Otoyomegatari]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Girls und Panzer]


__________________________________________________



04.
[My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Monster High]


__________________________________________________



06.
[My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Jackass 3D]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Paranatural]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Angelina Jolie]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Der Ring des Nibelungen]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Mary Shelley's Frankenhole]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Medium]


__________________________________________________



13.
[The Americans]


__________________________________________________



14.
[The Mindy Project]


__________________________________________________



15.
[5Dolls, T-ARA]


__________________________________________________



16.
[A Good Day To Die Hard]


__________________________________________________



17.
[Harry Potter]



__________________________________________________



18. http://i45.tinypic.com/2v0bjpd.jpg
[linked for porn, Spartacus: Vengeance]


__________________________________________________














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #321.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
mekkio: (Default)

Re: anon

[personal profile] mekkio 2013-03-01 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
You just kind of proved my point, anon.

Re: anon

(Anonymous) 2013-03-01 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
DA

No, they really didn't.

Re: anon

[personal profile] sugar_spun 2013-03-01 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
...Mekkio sort of did. Their point (I presume) was that even without accounts anons would still be making huge assumptions about each other. Anon was making a big assumption about mekkio--they they were being insulting and dismissive, even though they weren't. They simply attacked the other side with great prejudice.

Anon-only wouldn't solve that.

Re: anon

(Anonymous) 2013-03-01 01:42 am (UTC)(link)
mekkio was making a point that anons would make assumptions about other anons. since the anon was making an assumption about a user with a name and history, anon actually disproved mekkio's point, which was that having everybody anon would make things worse. in actuality things would not change, because whether a person is posting anon or with an identity, this group of people we have here like to make assumptions about each other, regardless of whether their target is posting with an identity or anon.

Re: anon

[personal profile] sugar_spun 2013-03-01 01:45 am (UTC)(link)
I presume mekkio's point was that EVERYONE makes assumptions about each other regardless of accounts. Specifically saying that anons will make assumptions about other anons.

That fact that one anon was willing to make an assumption of a user strengthens their point.

My presumption is mekkio supports users posting because at least it isn't a completer clusterfuck.

Re: anon

(Anonymous) 2013-03-01 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
i think we're understanding mekkio's point differently. i think previous anon understood it in the way i understood it. mekkio was not as clear as they needed to be, in any case, and you are furthering what you think is her point but may not have been. which is fine, as it is a point regardless, but, well, this argument is now pointless, is all i'm trying to say. arguing over technicalities is tedious when things are somewhat unclear.

Re: anon

(Anonymous) 2013-03-01 03:07 am (UTC)(link)
noooooo? mekkio seems to think that if everyone's anon it will turn into a wankfest...therefore leading into the weird and incorrect idea that usernames somehow reduce wank or arguments

I beg to differ as FS would not change in the drastic way they seem to think. wank levels would remain much the same and Mekkio is being rather insulting and dismissive in their attitude that being anon = trollish mass or more wank simply because of anonyminity. it's the same people as usual, the wank will ebb and flow as usual, anon or not.

Re: anon

(Anonymous) 2013-03-01 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
AYRT

*looks at what you post*

*looks at what I post*


I think you need your eyes checked, username. why don't you make more blanket assumptions