[ SECRET POST #2250 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2250 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Stan Lee]


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Pusher II]


__________________________________________________



04.
[nigahiga]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.
[code lyoko evolution]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________
















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
















10. [SPOILERS for Homestuck]



__________________________________________________



11. [SPOILERS for Kuroko no Basket]



__________________________________________________

















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

















12. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for abuse]



__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for rape]

[SNSD/Girls' Generation]


__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for dub-con]



__________________________________________________



16. [WARNING for sexual assault]

[One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest]


__________________________________________________

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #321.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I read the book, and the "its evil for a women to be in control" is pretty spot on.

http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_guide/literature/one-flew-over-the-cuckoos-nest/critical-essays/role-of-women.html

[insanenoodlyguy]

Right in the damn quotes on those cliff notes (which are sure as hell not proof you read the book) it specifically has the character describing men and women alike as "ball cutters" a masculine focused term to be sure, but not one exclusively assigned to femininity.

I don't think you did read the book. Or you read it looking for something you found.

Cliff notes aren't gospel. Agree or disagree, that's proof of jack shit.

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think you did read the book. Or you read it looking for something you found.

Cliff notes aren't gospel. Agree or disagree, that's proof of jack shit.

this

using cliff notes to justify some bullshit agenda is pretty lame. if the ayrt wants to show is specifically in the text and discuss it from a literary perspective, I'd enjoy the break down of it.

but throwing quotes from cliff notes (used by people who are too fucking lazy to read the book) just shows they are yanking what they want to support their half-assed theory and still try to look smart.

here's a clue. for those of us who have read the book? we can tell you're going by the cliff notes. just sayin'...

[insanenoodlyguy]

Obviously there's been critiques/reviews of books I agreed with, but I don't interpret them as fact. The only time I accept that sort of thing is when the author actually says "this is what I wanted to do with this." then, irregardless of if he did or didn't pull off that goal, I feel we have a legit context with which to interpret the work.

And I'm invoking my own little godwin's law esque thing right now: anybody who responds to this with some death of the author bullshit will not get a response because you aren't worth talking to. Barthes was saying we don't always know what the Author's intention was, but sometimes we do. And while you might pull something different from the work, then saying "this is what the author intended" is not what that was about at all.

Edit: on a meta level, saying anything about what death of the author intended is, I suppose, a bit against the documents spirit.

[(Anonymous)]

And what exactly is written in that cliffnotes page that is incorrect about the novel?

it specifically has the character describing men and women alike as "ball cutters" a masculine focused term to be sure, but not one exclusively assigned to femininity.

Yes, but that passing reference doesn't change the fact that all the "ball-cutters" who actually appear in the book are women.

[insanenoodlyguy]

the fact that it is full of opinions you treat as fact.

[(Anonymous)]

The female characters in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest can be divided into two extreme categories: "ball-cutters" and whores. The former is represented by Nurse Ratched, Harding's wife, Billy Bibbit's mother, and Chief Bromden's mother.

Each of these women are intent on dominating men by emasculating them, whereas the whores Candy and Sandy are dedicated to pleasuring men and doing what they're told.

Is this false?