[ SECRET POST #2254 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2254 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15. http://i.imgur.com/Kvb5F08.png?1
[family guy (?), warning for cartoon rape]


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #322.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Just a heads up: This blogger is a fucking dooley.

If there's one point that might help inform you about her true opinions it's that she believes to be a feminist you must also be a pacifist. Masculine traits such as violence must be rejected etc, etc.

There's a whole list of stuff she's said on the YMMV page (TVTropes.org) for feminist frequency if you're interested..

She has a whole list of whacked out beliefs about men and women, so you might be giving her the benefit of the doubt a bit too soon.

[sugar_spun]

Hm...I'm not sure what to think, then. I mean, I think the argument on it's own has some really fair and valid points that I don't think should simply be dismissed because some of her ideas are poor.

But I guess I would have to see those things for myself, because, well, just based on this one issue with Mattie it seems easy for people to put words into her mouth. On that YMMV page, I would say they characterized her idea very differently than how I understood it.