[ SECRET POST #2264 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2264 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Criminal Minds, Dharma & Greg]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Teen Wolf/Colton Haynes]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Alex and Emma Watson]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Anthony Bourdain and Guy Fieri]


__________________________________________________



08.
[World of Warcraft]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Kuroko no Basket]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Les Miserables]


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.
[Psycho Pass]


__________________________________________________



13.
[Journey Into Mystery]


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

















15. [SPOILERS for Buffy]



__________________________________________________
















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]



















16. [SPOILERS for Spartacus]
[WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



17. [WARNING for child abuse]
http://oi46.tinypic.com/25akho2.jpg
[Kuroshitsuji; linked for (obvious) child abuse, animated]


__________________________________________________



18. [WARNING for incest]

[Revolution]


__________________________________________________



19. [WARNING for rape/abuse]

[Assassin's Creed 3]


__________________________________________________





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #323.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Since SJW discussions are in vogue these days

[(Anonymous)]

So it's a slippery slope argument, then? "First we let you believe that God loves you, then you'll want us to let you believe that it's okay to kill gay people?" I'm not totally sure that tracks.

Re: Since SJW discussions are in vogue these days

[(Anonymous)]

da

Well, allowing people to believe that some invisible deity loves them isn't objectively harmful to others in and of itself. There's such a thing as religious tolerance, but there comes a point when religious tolerance comes up against civil rights, and the idea that (subsets of) religious morals trump the population's right to equality, health, and liberty is disgusting and harmful. Religious tolerance only holds up until it starts infringing on other people's rights. However, subsets with oppressive and harmful religious beliefs think that "religious tolerance" can and should protect their right to not only believe, but openly practice and base legislation on those harmful beliefs, simply because it's ostensibly for religious reasons. The SJW response, if I'm understanding this correctly, is that since apparently there is no happy medium that we can agree on, then all religious beliefs are and should be subject to question and criticism - up to and including beliefs that don't actually harm others in some way.

If that's correct, then I sort of get the response - we tried religious tolerance and it just made people (of certain religions) entitled assholes about their so-called religious beliefs, so if we can't compromise on what is and isn't an acceptable belief, then...all religious beliefs are verboten. It's extreme and I don't agree with it, but it's not an entirely irrational response.

Re: Since SJW discussions are in vogue these days

[(Anonymous)]

There's such a thing as religious tolerance, but there comes a point when religious tolerance comes up against civil rights, and the idea that (subsets of) religious morals trump the population's right to equality, health, and liberty is disgusting and harmful. Religious tolerance only holds up until it starts infringing on other people's rights.

Exactly. I'm all for respecting other people's beliefs and opinions, up until the point when their opinions start infringing on other people's rights, and at that point, we're no longer having a discussion. I don't care what you believe or why, if your beliefs interfere with other people's rights, then your belief is not worth respecting. This idea that I hear from otherwise open-minded, intelligent people that all beliefs are somehow equal and valid regardless of how they might harm other people or infringe upon their rights just completely boggles my mind.