Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-03-18 06:42 pm
[ SECRET POST #2267 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2267 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #324.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 3 - trolls ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Wow.
(Anonymous) 2013-03-18 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)It's... it's about what you'd think.
Re: Wow.
(Anonymous) 2013-03-18 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)It's not that surprising that it would be terrible, either, although I can't necessarily predict the way in which it's terrible - has /pol/ invaded it yet, or is it just run-of-the-mill 4chan terribleness?
Re: Wow.
(Anonymous) 2013-03-18 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)See for yourself.
Re: Wow.
(Anonymous) 2013-03-18 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Wow.
(Anonymous) 2013-03-18 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Wow.
(Anonymous) 2013-03-19 12:00 am (UTC)(link)Re: Wow.
Re: Wow.
(Anonymous) 2013-03-18 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Wow.
(Anonymous) 2013-03-18 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Wow.
You wrote the boards epithet on the day it was created. Fitting.
Re: Wow.
(Anonymous) 2013-03-18 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Wow.
Re: Wow.
Re: Wow.
It sucked so hard it ripped a hole in Paradox Space and turned inside out. It wasn't even fun, it was just a troll masturbation fest.
Re: Wow.
Plus, as a new board, I'm mostly just gonna check out the general atmosphere after the newness has dropped, and it's not got the influx of easy mode trolling.
Re: Wow.
(Anonymous) 2013-03-19 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)That's the thing about 4chan these days - it's not morally vile or shocking anymore. It's mostly just shitty.
Re: Wow.
"That's the thing about 4chan..."
I think that depends on which boards you're talking about since the culture in each one can be completely different from the one viewed as being sitewide. While I can't stand /v/ anymore (and don't know why I used to tbh), never liked /b/ or /r9k/, I will pretty much always love /ck/, /cm/, and /u/.
Re: Wow.
(Anonymous) 2013-03-19 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)It's certainly true that it can very immensely from board to board, but I think it's actually very hard for individual board cultures to maintain themselves for long - there's a tendency for all of them to come towards the same point, which is mostly shitty and trollish - an entropy-like effect that pretty much leads almost all boards to suck eventually. I've pretty much stopped visiting 4chan entirely in the last couple months (mostly because I've had to accept, after a long period of denial, that my once-home board has pretty much passed the point of no return and just sucks now).
/ck/ is definitely one of the brighter spots along with /trv/, both very good boards that I mostly enjoyed. and perhaps /cm/ and /u/ are able to maintain some sort of distinctiveness. But I think over the long term, the demographic realities of who posts on the board, the prevalence of anonymity, and the more or less total absence of moderation combine to mean that, over the long term, it's really hard for any board to maintain a decent level of quality.